From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org,
david@fromorbit.com, chandanbabu@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
willy@infradead.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] xfs: reserve blocks for truncating realtime inode
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 07:10:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240531141000.GH52987@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZlnFvWsvfrR1HBZW@infradead.org>
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 05:42:37AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > - error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_itruncate, 0, 0, 0, &tp);
> > + resblks = XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip) ? XFS_DIOSTRAT_SPACE_RES(mp, 0) : 0;
>
> This probably wants a comment explaining that we need the block
> reservation for bmap btree block allocations / splits that can happen
> because we can split a written extent into one written and one
> unwritten, while for the data fork we'll always just shorten or
> remove extents.
"for the data fork"? <confused>
This always runs on the data fork. Did you mean "for files with alloc
unit > 1 fsblock"?
> I'd also find this more readable if resblks was initialized to 0,
> and this became a:
>
> if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(ip))
> resblks = XFS_DIOSTRAT_SPACE_RES(mp, 0);
Agreed.
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-31 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-29 9:51 [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] iomap/xfs: fix stale data exposure when truncating realtime inodes Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:51 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/8] iomap: zeroing needs to be pagecache aware Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 14:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:44 ` Brian Foster
2024-05-31 15:43 ` Brian Foster
2024-06-02 22:22 ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-02 11:04 ` Brian Foster
2024-06-03 9:07 ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-03 14:37 ` Brian Foster
2024-06-04 23:38 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/8] math64: add rem_u64() to just return the remainder Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/8] iomap: pass blocksize to iomap_truncate_page() Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-02 11:16 ` Brian Foster
2024-06-03 13:23 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 4/8] fsdax: pass blocksize to dax_truncate_page() Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 5/8] xfs: refactor the truncating order Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-03 13:51 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 15:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-03 14:15 ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-02 22:46 ` Dave Chinner
2024-06-03 14:18 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 6/8] xfs: correct the truncate blocksize of realtime inode Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-03 14:35 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 7/8] xfs: reserve blocks for truncating " Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:10 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-05-31 14:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:29 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-29 9:52 ` [RFC PATCH v4 8/8] xfs: improve truncate on a realtime inode with huge extsize Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 13:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 14:12 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-05-31 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-31 15:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-04 7:09 ` Zhang Yi
2024-05-31 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/8] iomap/xfs: fix stale data exposure when truncating realtime inodes Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-01 7:38 ` Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 7:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240531141000.GH52987@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandanbabu@kernel.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).