From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com,
yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] ext4: don't set EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED on allocated blocks
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 11:41:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240601034149.2169771-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240601034149.2169771-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Since we always set EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE when allocating
delalloc blocks, there is no need to keep delayed flag on the unwritten
extent status entry, so just drop it after allocation.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 9 +--------
fs/ext4/inode.c | 11 -----------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 23caf1f028b0..084ea0a753ee 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -867,14 +867,7 @@ void ext4_es_insert_extent(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t lblk,
return;
BUG_ON(end < lblk);
-
- if ((status & EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED) &&
- (status & EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN)) {
- ext4_warning(inode->i_sb, "Inserting extent [%u/%u] as "
- " delayed and written which can potentially "
- " cause data loss.", lblk, len);
- WARN_ON(1);
- }
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(status & EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED);
newes.es_lblk = lblk;
newes.es_len = len;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 1f6de35e6216..0dde2bf078ba 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -558,12 +558,6 @@ static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ?
EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN;
- if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) &&
- !(status & EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN) &&
- ext4_es_scan_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, map->m_lblk,
- map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1))
- status |= EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED;
-
ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len,
map->m_pblk, status);
@@ -682,11 +676,6 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ?
EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN;
- if (!(flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE) &&
- !(status & EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN) &&
- ext4_es_scan_range(inode, &ext4_es_is_delayed, map->m_lblk,
- map->m_lblk + map->m_len - 1))
- status |= EXTENT_STATUS_DELAYED;
ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len,
map->m_pblk, status);
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-01 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-01 3:41 [PATCH 00/10] ext4: simplify the counting and management of delalloc reserved blocks Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 01/10] ext4: factor out ext4_map_create_blocks() to allocate new blocks Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 02/10] ext4: optimize the EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_DELALLOC_RESERVE flag set Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 04/10] ext4: let __revise_pending() return newly inserted pendings Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 05/10] ext4: count removed reserved blocks for delalloc only extent entry Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 06/10] ext4: update delalloc data reserve spcae in ext4_es_insert_extent() Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 07/10] ext4: drop ext4_es_delayed_clu() Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 08/10] ext4: use ext4_map_query_blocks() in ext4_map_blocks() Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 09/10] ext4: drop ext4_es_is_delonly() Zhang Yi
2024-06-01 3:41 ` [PATCH 10/10] ext4: drop all delonly descriptions Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240601034149.2169771-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).