linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: chandan.babu@oracle.com, dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@oracle.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] xfs: Do not free EOF blocks for forcealign
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 12:08:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240621190842.GN3058325@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621100540.2976618-9-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

On Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 10:05:35AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> For when forcealign is enabled, we want the EOF to be aligned as well, so
> do not free EOF blocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> index e5d893f93522..56b80a7c0992 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_util.c
> @@ -539,8 +539,13 @@ xfs_can_free_eofblocks(
>  	 * forever.
>  	 */
>  	end_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, (xfs_ufsize_t)XFS_ISIZE(ip));
> -	if (xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(ip))
> +
> +	/* Do not free blocks when forcing extent sizes */

"Only try to free blocks beyond the allocation unit that crosses EOF" ?

Otherwise seems fine to me
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>

--D

> +	if (xfs_inode_has_forcealign(ip))
> +		end_fsb = roundup_64(end_fsb, ip->i_extsize);
> +	else if (xfs_inode_has_bigrtalloc(ip))
>  		end_fsb = xfs_rtb_roundup_rtx(mp, end_fsb);
> +
>  	last_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSB(mp, mp->m_super->s_maxbytes);
>  	if (last_fsb <= end_fsb)
>  		return false;
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-21 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-21 10:05 [PATCH 00/13] forcealign for xfs John Garry
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 01/13] xfs: only allow minlen allocations when near ENOSPC John Garry
2024-06-21 19:42   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 20:04     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 02/13] xfs: always tail align maxlen allocations John Garry
2024-06-21 19:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: simplify extent allocation alignment John Garry
2024-06-21 20:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs: make EOF allocation simpler John Garry
2024-06-21 20:35   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: introduce forced allocation alignment John Garry
2024-06-21 20:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs: align args->minlen for " John Garry
2024-06-21 20:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs: Introduce FORCEALIGN inode flag John Garry
2024-06-21 19:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24 14:36     ` John Garry
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs: Do not free EOF blocks for forcealign John Garry
2024-06-21 19:08   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-06-24 15:04     ` John Garry
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs: Update xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize_fsb() " John Garry
2024-06-21 18:38   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24  7:34     ` John Garry
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs: Unmap blocks according to forcealign John Garry
2024-06-21 19:12   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-24 15:12     ` John Garry
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs: Only free full extents for forcealign John Garry
2024-06-21 19:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs: Don't revert allocated offset " John Garry
2024-06-21 19:13   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-06-21 10:05 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs: Enable file data forcealign feature John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240621190842.GN3058325@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).