From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069A613BADF for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720097236; cv=none; b=WEXhW4QIoK81TWozE4AF1PPwrC2B1owTsnXQDmX4Pi6cr5zFAFZ7XL+YH1B+ZxTMN6q9Mn5kElHoA8I6lBiqfIaKpxRVDmjhebEzq3NNclHTu6zE5vJ518QXrxUedNga7gJM+tf32VKd+AQUhyAUPLAtgTXHKLQmmljed2Thktg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720097236; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CkfWZCKITynqRfS7TMnTh8xeNwILNPLBc2I97gVJAbQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=m37Uq/s90GjBahPvKUGCkZt1O7nmxTMWvMp0HPiHRCwRBEFfw46n86enH7znu/2KtS1PmySAl4N4Q4o3rQ7t5mX+igUNoWpWdPBI1uIp12l8WyXcz5eydJtjinjzmlZk1ZTC81mRw8nk5o4vHup3mGTKSPo2F20yLEu+BUJ5RHY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE77367; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 05:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e124191.cambridge.arm.com (e124191.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.45]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A177D3F762; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 05:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 13:47:04 +0100 From: Joey Gouly To: Catalin Marinas Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com, bp@alien8.de, broonie@kernel.org, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maz@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev, shuah@kernel.org, szabolcs.nagy@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, will@kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/29] arm64: convert protection key into vm_flags and pgprot values Message-ID: <20240704124704.GA3548388@e124191.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20240503130147.1154804-1-joey.gouly@arm.com> <20240503130147.1154804-14-joey.gouly@arm.com> <4f7d8691-fe19-4e8a-95e5-9f7680c82021@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi, On Wed, Jun 19, 2024 at 05:45:29PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 12:24:57PM +0530, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > > On 5/3/24 18:31, Joey Gouly wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h > > > index 5966ee4a6154..ecb2d18dc4d7 100644 > > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mman.h > > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > > > #include > > > static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot, > > > - unsigned long pkey __always_unused) > > > + unsigned long pkey) > > > { > > > unsigned long ret = 0; > > > @@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ static inline unsigned long arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(unsigned long prot, > > > if (system_supports_mte() && (prot & PROT_MTE)) > > > ret |= VM_MTE; > > > +#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS) > > > > Should there be system_supports_poe() check like above? > > I think it should, otherwise we end up with these bits in the pte even > when POE is not supported. I think it can't get here due to the flow of the code, but I will add it to be defensive (since it's just an alternative that gets patched). I still need the defined(CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS) check, since the VM_PKEY_BIT* are only defined then. > > > > + ret |= pkey & 0x1 ? VM_PKEY_BIT0 : 0; > > > + ret |= pkey & 0x2 ? VM_PKEY_BIT1 : 0; > > > + ret |= pkey & 0x4 ? VM_PKEY_BIT2 : 0; > > > +#endif > > > + > > > return ret; > > > } > > > #define arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey) arch_calc_vm_prot_bits(prot, pkey) Thanks, Joey