From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
syzbot+701037856c25b143f1ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsnotify: Avoid data race between fsnotify_recalc_mask() and fsnotify_object_watched()
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:22:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240715142203.GA1649877@perftesting> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240715130410.30475-1-jack@suse.cz>
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 03:04:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> When __fsnotify_recalc_mask() recomputes the mask on the watched object,
> the compiler can "optimize" the code to perform partial updates to the
> mask (including zeroing it at the beginning). Thus places checking
> the object mask without conn->lock such as fsnotify_object_watched()
> could see invalid states of the mask. Make sure the mask update is
> performed by one memory store using WRITE_ONCE().
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+701037856c25b143f1ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CACT4Y+Zk0ohwwwHSD63U2-PQ=UuamXczr1mKBD6xtj2dyYKBvA@mail.gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
I'm still hazy on the rules here and what KCSAN expects, but if we're using
READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE on a thing, do we have to use them everywhere we access
that member? Because there's a few accesses in include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
that were missed if so. Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-15 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-15 13:04 [PATCH v2] fsnotify: Avoid data race between fsnotify_recalc_mask() and fsnotify_object_watched() Jan Kara
2024-07-15 14:22 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2024-07-15 14:48 ` Marco Elver
2024-07-17 13:16 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240715142203.GA1649877@perftesting \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+701037856c25b143f1ad@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).