From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF33E143889; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:22:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722000136; cv=none; b=YHMagqhfwgE0IL+cKjTXCVIBSq63HGt3tQqE5fLG3kjIosgBd1TlH2hi5ogwYXtQHOwYTnwwQTqr8JrNN6FP0t6eHpwbuwRR+ipJ/OXb3ChN+ROl8IfHyMZKsUTFXBZHCQOc/omOiEZUPq6Lt9UEH9A3Ei6DzNUMYSX626enbAE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722000136; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2XPNAANLlnV18mYheSqcXKSvPqiSzT1mkrdmG03hAHs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Q25aK+EqIWuJXHG+b0v6CkHzwVpEF/KxIiu3iQp+s5xPT/pmfhA0zSJZudYOD3wUnRLExwJctOViLdckRKwmqrin5r5TL5gHgSY2VuX/1mfZ9clPSV9Hr5XxE7TzP8ov9OjN1vPVct3Yj00udT5sGrkcUfYeKPKhB/2NHAT/f4Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=N28z2Dnd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="N28z2Dnd" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ABB14C32782; Fri, 26 Jul 2024 13:22:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1722000135; bh=2XPNAANLlnV18mYheSqcXKSvPqiSzT1mkrdmG03hAHs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=N28z2DndMp3MEstTCyzAuQOTUMcD2/dS12rriNfZQyHu02MQtepDOm3B2GRUDJhpX qhc6dz17K3AtVDQr5mlVdjft44oniEFUzfd3FWG2vE+nZ9xKV8Euz0wvOyMl+T7myD l51XAsXRPE0a35s49WnqTxESJMY1cYeWGLfB9zRILENFzZ34s3rxD/poqOEpbzW56y T9daK6hXfOrdWehsoXvOwm/UFtfWkeJZT0dgyzqds4GBQI4TCj8fFV8WWANVhg5FOG oZ/RJWk14QePTTRJNtj88YGwxEwVoK0SyJ8OcHxwgRAj7LBx36SrfgxmgLgpmn35kn AuRrPH9rgojpA== Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 15:22:09 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Matt Bobrowski Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, jannh@google.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/3] introduce new VFS based BPF kfuncs Message-ID: <20240726-clown-geantwortet-eb29a17890c3@brauner> References: <20240726085604.2369469-1-mattbobrowski@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240726085604.2369469-1-mattbobrowski@google.com> On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 08:56:01AM GMT, Matt Bobrowski wrote: > G'day! > > The original cover letter providing background context and motivating > factors around the needs for these new VFS related BPF kfuncs > introduced within this patch series can be found here [0]. Please do > reference that if needed. > > The changes contained within this version of the patch series mainly > came at the back of discussions held with Christian at LSFMMBPF > recently. In summary, the primary difference within this patch series > when compared to the last [1] is that I've reduced the number of VFS > related BPF kfuncs being introduced, housed them under fs/, and added > more selftests. I have no complaints about this now that it's been boiled down. So as far as I'm concerned I'm happy to pick this up. (I also wouldn't mind follow-up patches that move the xattr bpf kfuncs under fs/ as well.)