From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com,
jack@suse.cz, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] iomap: advance the ifs allocation if we have more than one blocks per folio
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:13:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240731091305.2896873-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240731091305.2896873-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Now we allocate ifs if i_blocks_per_folio is larger than one when
writing back dirty folios in iomap_writepage_map(), so we don't attach
an ifs after buffer write to an entire folio until it starts writing
back, if we partial truncate that folio, iomap_invalidate_folio() can't
clear counterpart block's dirty bit as expected. Fix this by advance the
ifs allocation to __iomap_write_begin().
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 64c4808fab31..ec17bf8d62e9 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -686,6 +686,12 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
size_t from = offset_in_folio(folio, pos), to = from + len;
size_t poff, plen;
+ if (nr_blocks > 1) {
+ ifs = ifs_alloc(iter->inode, folio, iter->flags);
+ if ((iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT) && !ifs)
+ return -EAGAIN;
+ }
+
/*
* If the write or zeroing completely overlaps the current folio, then
* entire folio will be dirtied so there is no need for
@@ -697,10 +703,6 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
pos + len >= folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio))
return 0;
- ifs = ifs_alloc(iter->inode, folio, iter->flags);
- if ((iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT) && !ifs && nr_blocks > 1)
- return -EAGAIN;
-
if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
return 0;
folio_clear_error(folio);
@@ -1913,7 +1915,12 @@ static int iomap_writepage_map(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
WARN_ON_ONCE(end_pos <= pos);
if (i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio) > 1) {
- if (!ifs) {
+ /*
+ * This should not happen since we always allocate ifs in
+ * iomap_folio_mkwrite_iter() and there is more than one
+ * blocks per folio in __iomap_write_begin().
+ */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ifs)) {
ifs = ifs_alloc(inode, folio, 0);
iomap_set_range_dirty(folio, 0, end_pos - pos);
}
--
2.39.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 9:12 [PATCH 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] iomap: correct the range of a partial dirty clear Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] iomap: support invalidating partial folios Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] iomap: correct the dirty length in page mkwrite Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] iomap: drop unnecessary state_lock when setting ifs uptodate bits Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 16:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-01 1:52 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-01 4:24 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-01 9:19 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-02 0:05 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-02 2:57 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-02 6:29 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-02 11:13 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-05 12:42 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-05 14:00 ` Jan Kara
2024-08-05 15:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-07 11:39 ` Zhang Yi
2024-07-31 9:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] iomap: drop unnecessary state_lock when changing ifs dirty bits Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240731091305.2896873-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).