From: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: ast@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
jannh@google.com, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, memxor@gmail.com,
Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: introduce new VFS based BPF kfuncs
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 11:08:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240731110833.1834742-1-mattbobrowski@google.com> (raw)
G'day!
A respin based off v3, which can be found here [0]. Original
motivations for introducing this suite of BPF kfuncs can be found here
[1].
The primary difference in this version of the patch series is that the
suite of VFS related BPF kfuncs added can be used from both sleepable
and non-sleepable BPF LSM program types. IOW, the KF_SLEEPABLE
annotation has been removed from all of them.
Changes sinve v3:
* KF_SLEEPABLE annotation has been dropped from all newly introduced
VFS related BPF kfuncs. This includes bpf_get_task_exe_file(),
bpf_put_file(), and bpf_path_d_path(). Both negative and positive
selftests backing these new BPF kfuncs have also been updated
accordingly.
* buf__sz conditional in bpf_path_d_path() has been updated from
buf__sz <= 0, to !buf__sz.
* Syntax issues as reported so here [2] have been corrected.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240726085604.2369469-1-mattbobrowski@google.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/cover.1708377880.git.mattbobrowski@google.com/#t
[2] https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/static/nipa/874023/13742510/checkpatch/stdout
Matt Bobrowski (3):
bpf: introduce new VFS based BPF kfuncs
selftests/bpf: add negative tests for new VFS based BPF kfuncs
selftests/bpf: add positive tests for new VFS based BPF kfuncs
fs/Makefile | 1 +
fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c | 127 ++++++++++++++
.../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 26 +++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 4 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_vfs_accept.c | 85 +++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_vfs_reject.c | 161 ++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 404 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_vfs_accept.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_vfs_reject.c
--
2.46.0.rc2.264.g509ed76dc8-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-07-31 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-31 11:08 Matt Bobrowski [this message]
2024-07-31 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/3] bpf: introduce new VFS based BPF kfuncs Matt Bobrowski
2024-08-01 1:16 ` Song Liu
2024-08-06 16:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-07-31 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: add negative tests for " Matt Bobrowski
2024-07-31 11:08 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add positive " Matt Bobrowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240731110833.1834742-1-mattbobrowski@google.com \
--to=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).