linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz,
	willy@infradead.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] iomap: don't mark blocks uptodate after partial zeroing
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:49:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240812164912.GF6043@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812121159.3775074-6-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>

On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:11:58PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> 
> In __iomap_write_begin(), if we unaligned buffered write data to a hole
> of a regular file, we only zero out the place where aligned to block
> size that we don't want to write, but mark the whole range uptodate if
> block size < folio size. This is wrong since the not zeroed part will
> contains stale data and can be accessed by a concurrent buffered read
> easily (on the filesystem may not hold inode->i_rwsem) once we mark the
> range uptodate. Fix this by drop iomap_set_range_uptodate() in the
> zeroing out branch.
> 
> Fixes: 9dc55f1389f9 ("iomap: add support for sub-pagesize buffered I/O without buffer heads")
> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZqsN5ouQTEc1KAzV@casper.infradead.org/
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index ac762de9a27f..96600405dbb5 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -744,8 +744,8 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
>  					poff, plen, srcmap);
>  			if (status)
>  				return status;
> +			iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);
>  		}
> -		iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);

Don't we need to iomap_set_range_uptodate for the bytes that we zeroed
with folio_zero_segments?

--D

>  	} while ((block_start += plen) < block_end);
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-12 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-12 12:11 [PATCH v2 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iomap: correct the range of a partial dirty clear Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:33   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13  2:14     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  1:53     ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iomap: support invalidating partial folios Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] iomap: advance the ifs allocation if we have more than one blocks per folio Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:47   ` yangerkun
2024-08-13  2:21     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  5:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-14  7:08     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-15  6:00       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-16  1:44         ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17  4:27     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17  4:42       ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17  6:16         ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iomap: correct the dirty length in page mkwrite Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:45   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13  2:49     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  5:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-14  7:49     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-15  5:59       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-16  2:19         ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17  4:45   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17  6:43     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iomap: don't mark blocks uptodate after partial zeroing Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:49   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-08-13  3:01     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  5:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-17  4:48   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17  7:16     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iomap: reduce unnecessary state_lock when setting ifs uptodate and dirty bits Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:54   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-12 17:00   ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-13  8:15     ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  1:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Dave Chinner
2024-08-14  2:14   ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  2:47     ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-14  3:57       ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14  5:16         ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-14  6:32           ` Zhang Yi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240812164912.GF6043@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).