From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
brauner@kernel.org, david@fromorbit.com, jack@suse.cz,
willy@infradead.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] iomap: don't mark blocks uptodate after partial zeroing
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 09:49:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240812164912.GF6043@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240812121159.3775074-6-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 08:11:58PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>
> In __iomap_write_begin(), if we unaligned buffered write data to a hole
> of a regular file, we only zero out the place where aligned to block
> size that we don't want to write, but mark the whole range uptodate if
> block size < folio size. This is wrong since the not zeroed part will
> contains stale data and can be accessed by a concurrent buffered read
> easily (on the filesystem may not hold inode->i_rwsem) once we mark the
> range uptodate. Fix this by drop iomap_set_range_uptodate() in the
> zeroing out branch.
>
> Fixes: 9dc55f1389f9 ("iomap: add support for sub-pagesize buffered I/O without buffer heads")
> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZqsN5ouQTEc1KAzV@casper.infradead.org/
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index ac762de9a27f..96600405dbb5 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -744,8 +744,8 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
> poff, plen, srcmap);
> if (status)
> return status;
> + iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);
> }
> - iomap_set_range_uptodate(folio, poff, plen);
Don't we need to iomap_set_range_uptodate for the bytes that we zeroed
with folio_zero_segments?
--D
> } while ((block_start += plen) < block_end);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-12 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-12 12:11 [PATCH v2 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] iomap: correct the range of a partial dirty clear Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:33 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13 2:14 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 1:53 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] iomap: support invalidating partial folios Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] iomap: advance the ifs allocation if we have more than one blocks per folio Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:47 ` yangerkun
2024-08-13 2:21 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 5:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-14 7:08 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-15 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-16 1:44 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17 4:27 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17 4:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17 6:16 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] iomap: correct the dirty length in page mkwrite Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:45 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13 2:49 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-14 7:49 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-15 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-16 2:19 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-17 4:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17 6:43 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] iomap: don't mark blocks uptodate after partial zeroing Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:49 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-08-13 3:01 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 5:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-17 4:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-17 7:16 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 12:11 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] iomap: reduce unnecessary state_lock when setting ifs uptodate and dirty bits Zhang Yi
2024-08-12 16:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-12 17:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-08-13 8:15 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 1:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] iomap: some minor non-critical fixes and improvements when block size < folio size Dave Chinner
2024-08-14 2:14 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 2:47 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-14 3:57 ` Zhang Yi
2024-08-14 5:16 ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-14 6:32 ` Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240812164912.GF6043@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).