public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 0/5] inode: turn i_state into u32
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 18:06:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240820-work-i_state-v1-0-794360714829@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wh4=w4pANpAPbx=Kw-jiExEabJ0pwYHFgAYXVaD0AJjrA@mail.gmail.com>

Hey,

I've recently looked for some free space in struct inode again because
of some exec kerfuffle we recently had and while my idea didn't turn
into anything I noticed that we often waste bytes when using wait bit
operations. So I set out to switch that to another mechanism that would
allow us to free up bytes. So this is the attempt to turn i_state from
an unsigned long into an u32 using the address of the i_state bit in the
wait var event mechanism.

This survives LTP, xfstests on various filesystems, and will-it-scale.
It's possible I got it all wrong but I want to have the RFC out.

---
---
base-commit: 01e603fb789c75b3a0c63bddd42a42a710da7a52
change-id: 20240820-work-i_state-4e34db39bcf8


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-20 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-19  5:20 [PATCH 0/9 RFC] Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile NeilBrown
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 1/9] i915: remove wake_up on I915_RESET_MODESET NeilBrown
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 2/9] Introduce atomic_dec_and_wake_up_var() NeilBrown
2024-08-20  5:47   ` kernel test robot
2024-08-21  5:23   ` kernel test robot
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 3/9] XFS: use wait_var_event() when waiting of i_pincount NeilBrown
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 4/9] Use wait_var_event() instead of I_DIO_WAKEUP NeilBrown
2024-08-20  7:22   ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-20 19:12     ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 5/9] Block: switch bd_prepare_to_claim to use ___wait_var_event() NeilBrown
2024-08-20  4:18   ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-20 21:52     ` NeilBrown
2024-08-28  1:22       ` Dave Chinner
2024-08-28  5:20         ` NeilBrown
2024-08-21  7:10   ` kernel test robot
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 6/9] block/pktdvd: switch congestion waiting to ___wait_var_event() NeilBrown
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 7/9] Improve and expand wake_up_bit() interface NeilBrown
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 8/9] Improve and extend wake_up_var() interface NeilBrown
2024-08-19  5:20 ` [PATCH 9/9] Use clear_and_wake_up_bit() where appropriate NeilBrown
2024-08-19  6:13 ` [PATCH 0/9 RFC] Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile Linus Torvalds
2024-08-20 21:47   ` NeilBrown
2024-08-20 21:58     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-20 22:15       ` NeilBrown
2024-08-20 22:24         ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-19  8:16 ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-19 17:45   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-19 20:52   ` NeilBrown
2024-08-19 21:12     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-20 16:06       ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-08-20 16:06         ` [PATCH RFC 1/5] fs: add i_state helpers Christian Brauner
2024-08-20 17:10           ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-20 17:19             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-20 19:10               ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-20 19:08             ` Christian Brauner
2024-08-20 16:06         ` [PATCH RFC 2/5] writeback: port __I_SYNC to var event Christian Brauner
2024-08-20 16:06         ` [PATCH RFC 3/5] inode: port __I_NEW " Christian Brauner
2024-08-20 16:06         ` [PATCH RFC 4/5] inode: port __I_LRU_ISOLATING " Christian Brauner
2024-08-20 16:06         ` [PATCH RFC 5/5] inode: make i_state a u32 Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240820-work-i_state-v1-0-794360714829@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox