From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] iomap: remove the iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc return value
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 09:18:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240828161822.GJ1977952@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240828045252.GD31463@lst.de>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 06:52:52AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 09:36:13AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > >
> > > As the only instance of ->punch never returns an error, an such an error
> > > would be fatal anyway remove the entire error propagation and don't
> > > return an error code from iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc.
> >
> > Not sure I like this one -- if the ->iomap_begin method returns some
> > weird error to iomap_seek_{data,hole}, then I think we'd at least want
> > to complain about that?
>
> iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc never calls into
> iomap_seek_{data,hole} and thus ->iomap_begin. It just uses the lower
> level mapping_seek_hole_data that checks dirty state, and that always
> returns either an offset or -ENXIO, which is a special signal and not
> an error.
>
> > Though I guess we're punching delalloc mappings for a failed pagecache
> > write, so we've already got ourselves a juicy EIO to throw up to the
> > application so maybe it's fine not to bother with the error recovery
> > erroring out. Right?
>
> But that is true as well.
Ok, I'm satisfied,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-28 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 5:09 fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 01/10] iomap: handle a post-direct I/O invalidate race in iomap_write_delalloc_release Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-28 4:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-28 16:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-29 3:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29 14:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-30 3:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: improve shared block detection in iomap_unshare_iter Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 5:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-27 5:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-28 4:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-28 16:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 03/10] iomap: pass flags to iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:22 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 04/10] iomap: zeroing already holds invalidate_lock in iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-28 4:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 05/10] iomap: pass the iomap to the punch callback Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 06/10] iomap: remove the iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc return value Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-28 4:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-28 16:18 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support the COW fork in xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: share a bit more code in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: set IOMAP_F_SHARED for all COW fork allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-27 5:09 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: punch delalloc extents from the COW fork for COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-27 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240828161822.GJ1977952@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).