* [PATCH] VFS: check i_nlink count before trying to unlink
@ 2024-09-07 17:21 Ghanshyam Agrawal
2024-09-07 19:02 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ghanshyam Agrawal @ 2024-09-07 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: viro, brauner, jack
Cc: Ghanshyam Agrawal, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel,
syzbot+41b43444de86db4c5ed1
Reported-by: syzbot+41b43444de86db4c5ed1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=41b43444de86db4c5ed1
Signed-off-by: Ghanshyam Agrawal <ghanshyam1898@gmail.com>
---
fs/namei.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 5512cb10fa89..9e5214dfd05d 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -4419,7 +4419,8 @@ int vfs_unlink(struct mnt_idmap *idmap, struct inode *dir,
error = try_break_deleg(target, delegated_inode);
if (error)
goto out;
- error = dir->i_op->unlink(dir, dentry);
+ if (dentry->d_inode->i_nlink)
+ error = dir->i_op->unlink(dir, dentry);
if (!error) {
dont_mount(dentry);
detach_mounts(dentry);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] VFS: check i_nlink count before trying to unlink
2024-09-07 17:21 [PATCH] VFS: check i_nlink count before trying to unlink Ghanshyam Agrawal
@ 2024-09-07 19:02 ` Al Viro
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2024-09-07 19:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ghanshyam Agrawal
Cc: brauner, jack, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel,
syzbot+41b43444de86db4c5ed1
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 10:51:10PM +0530, Ghanshyam Agrawal wrote:
> Reported-by: syzbot+41b43444de86db4c5ed1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=41b43444de86db4c5ed1
> Signed-off-by: Ghanshyam Agrawal <ghanshyam1898@gmail.com>
As far as I can tell, you have jfs_unlink() find and remove a directory
entry without any problems, then find that the damn thing had corrupted
inode link count (presumably due to creatively fucked up image).
IF that's the case, NAK.
vfs_unlink() is *NOT* the place to try and cope with that kind of crap.
What's more, having unlink(2) quietly succeed and do nothing to directory
is simply wrong.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-07 19:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-07 17:21 [PATCH] VFS: check i_nlink count before trying to unlink Ghanshyam Agrawal
2024-09-07 19:02 ` Al Viro
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).