From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 771781E49F; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726145684; cv=none; b=Jo+aGY7Tb1QzGXmiU9NworR08IvtlqTVQ/86T/Q6tB5JmvbgaeJC1cv/WS6HgQPc6Qi3CuvWbwCC/cENJ1yIiSTbzCqbQD/PKTPhblLbrGcyi3BdfKHNt7wlCQvvafWAK6/UYJ4DRzeTY6jmCBvCw32fUBiQ08VqjNcobZ9Oi30= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726145684; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8APp/Yy2G604WqM1PE3PGOMTxoqh/mu66mcme6NivDw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OigZ2M9j/URkHtw842Jh5CrNeUXyIgixREj8v4ic0c+QnY2UqTWHwLKlW99PKHKl91FQHe+UAJDb4sDhVoYoW21Sr9rKvNba9IU1/2zOC5qYj0uxpQjtTAuYiAj1vWXqc9dG1yhBD3PGf29vTZtF8NkaTxGNrxUD8DZ9QUg51VM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.11.211 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lst.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lst.de Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B2EFE227AB5; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:54:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 14:54:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kanchan Joshi Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me, martin.petersen@oracle.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, jaegeuk@kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org, chuck.lever@oracle.com, bvanassche@acm.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, vishak.g@samsung.com, javier.gonz@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] fcntl: rename rw_hint_* to rw_lifetime_hint_* Message-ID: <20240912125438.GB28068@lst.de> References: <20240910150200.6589-1-joshi.k@samsung.com> <20240910150200.6589-3-joshi.k@samsung.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240910150200.6589-3-joshi.k@samsung.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 08:31:57PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote: > F_GET/SET_RW_HINT fcntl handlers query/set write life hints. > Rename the handlers/helpers to be explicit that write life hints are > being handled. > > This is in preparation to introduce a new interface that supports more > than one type of write hint. Wouldn't it make more sense to stick with the name as exposed in the uapi? The same minda applies to the previous patch - in fact IFF we decide to do the rename I'd probably expect both parts to go together.