From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
chandan.babu@oracle.com, djwong@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
catherine.hoang@oracle.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] forcealign for xfs
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 05:33:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240923033305.GA30200@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZvDZHC1NJWlOR6Uf@dread.disaster.area>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 12:57:32PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Ok, but that's not going to be widespread. Very little storage
> hardware out there supports atomic writes - the vast majority of
> deployments will be new hardware that will have mkfs run on it.
Just about every enterprise NVMe SSD supports atomic write size
larger than a single LBA, because it is completely natural fallout
from FTL deѕign. That beeing said to support those SSDs a block
size of 16 or 32k would be a lot more natural than all the forcealign
madness.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-23 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-13 16:36 [PATCH v4 00/14] forcealign for xfs John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] xfs: only allow minlen allocations when near ENOSPC John Garry
2024-08-23 16:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] xfs: always tail align maxlen allocations John Garry
2024-08-23 16:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-29 17:58 ` John Garry
2024-08-29 21:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] xfs: simplify extent allocation alignment John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] xfs: make EOF allocation simpler John Garry
2024-09-04 18:25 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-09-05 7:51 ` John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] xfs: introduce forced allocation alignment John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] xfs: align args->minlen for " John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] xfs: Introduce FORCEALIGN inode flag John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] xfs: Update xfs_inode_alloc_unitsize() for forcealign John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] xfs: Update xfs_setattr_size() " John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] xfs: Do not free EOF blocks " John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] xfs: Only free full extents " John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] xfs: Unmap blocks according to forcealign John Garry
2024-08-23 16:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] xfs: Don't revert allocated offset for forcealign John Garry
2024-08-13 16:36 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] xfs: Enable file data forcealign feature John Garry
2024-09-04 18:14 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] forcealign for xfs Ritesh Harjani
2024-09-04 23:20 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-05 3:56 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-09-05 6:33 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-10 2:51 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-09-16 6:33 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-10 12:33 ` Ritesh Harjani
2024-09-16 7:03 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-16 10:24 ` John Garry
2024-09-17 20:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-17 23:34 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-17 22:12 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-18 7:59 ` John Garry
2024-09-23 2:57 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-23 3:33 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-09-23 8:16 ` John Garry
2024-09-23 12:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 12:33 ` John Garry
2024-09-24 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 9:48 ` John Garry
2024-11-29 11:36 ` John Garry
2024-09-23 8:00 ` John Garry
2024-09-05 10:15 ` John Garry
2024-09-05 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-06 14:31 ` John Garry
2024-09-08 22:49 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-09 16:18 ` John Garry
2024-09-16 5:25 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-16 9:44 ` John Garry
2024-09-17 22:27 ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-18 10:12 ` John Garry
2024-11-14 12:48 ` Long Li
2024-11-14 16:22 ` John Garry
2024-11-14 20:07 ` Dave Chinner
2024-11-15 8:14 ` John Garry
2024-11-15 11:20 ` Long Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240923033305.GA30200@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).