linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 23:05:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240924060516.GO21877@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240924055533.GA10756@lst.de>

On Tue, Sep 24, 2024 at 07:55:33AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 09:18:25AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > + * When a short write occurs, the filesystem may need to remove reserved space
> > > + * that was allocated in ->iomap_begin from it's ->iomap_end method. For
> > 
> > "When a short write occurs, the filesystem may need to remove space
> > reservations created in ->iomap_begin.
> 
> This just moved the text from the existing comment.  I agree that your
> wording is better, but I'd keep the "from it's ->iomap_end".

Yeah, please do.  What do you think of:

"When a short write occurs, the filesystem might need to use ->iomap_end
to remove space reservations created in ->iomap_begin." ?

> > Unrelated question about iomap_write_begin: Can we get rid of the
> > !mapping_large_folio_support if-body just prior to __iomap_get_folio?
> > filemap_get_folio won't return large folios if
> > !mapping_large_folio_support, so I think the separate check in iomap
> > isn't needed anymore?
> 
> From the iomap POV it seems like we could (after checking no one
> is doing something weird with len in ->get_folio).

The only user I know of is gfs2, which allocates a transaction and then
calls iomap_get_folio with pos/len unchanged.

--D

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-24  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-23 15:28 fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v3 Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/10] iomap: factor out a iomap_last_written_block helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:53   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-24  5:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 16:18   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-23 22:43     ` Dave Chinner
2024-09-24  5:55     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  6:05       ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-09-24  6:10         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/10] iomap: move locking out of iomap_write_delalloc_release Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 16:19   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: factor out a xfs_file_write_zero_eof helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 16:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: take XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL xfs_file_write_zero_eof Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: zeroing already holds invalidate_lock Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 16:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-24  5:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support the COW fork in xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: share more code in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: set IOMAP_F_SHARED for all COW fork allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-23 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: punch delalloc extents from the COW fork for COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-25  9:19 ` fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v3 Christian Brauner
2024-09-25  9:24   ` fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v4 Christian Brauner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-24  7:40 Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 01/10] iomap: factor out a iomap_last_written_block helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24 14:58   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 03/10] iomap: move locking out of iomap_write_delalloc_release Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: factor out a xfs_file_write_zero_eof helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: take XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL xfs_file_write_zero_eof Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: zeroing already holds invalidate_lock Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support the COW fork in xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: share more code in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: set IOMAP_F_SHARED for all COW fork allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-24  7:40 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: punch delalloc extents from the COW fork for COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-05 15:53 ` fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v4 Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-07  5:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-07  6:28     ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-07  6:46       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-07 15:20         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-08  8:59 fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08  8:59 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240924060516.GO21877@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).