From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FC44139D04; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 01:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727402176; cv=none; b=ju1ip3zMrHo7RdQD2mZg8svu0pUL8d/f3YNFzKg9balz3D8Qf/5IL+A/AY6E2ppLtJ7FUaCfrPVkx2urWFfAyrkNuWnGN+sACfX2jF8fw/m57nssLD+pdRiPkajAr8CDTcWM6F0cZnVRLqlGLdi2n3Fczvd79FpW8f1gdbAQ/Ow= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727402176; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ncoRFY8uh8Mcll71lsrLV3hAG3+Z6uNOuYcscTQA4+M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=YRIrjb2RR1hPeIQXKFNtZA/3fJZUEwqKZhdsCGoiB4yONTHrB0WIFksLs5xxeyhEc6TKwy+qMdNot5AmwKdLttFF4a42FWylxENnppn3sQ/8y1b1QEjhqFUmg5Eonuvr2bc1BIB841FypkyLNM9yvl6hnrBzypwblzwSS5UMJRQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=cXdoxNmd; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="cXdoxNmd" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:In-Reply-To:References; bh=akB9JoRv18U9cgJ4MunbjCcH+dfMeNfJaDufYgRIIdY=; b=cXdoxNmdsJh0q8qEH9PujgudJy 0tKKAhs33nn79i5DtJaokcJvxlTdtT7WP9HmvZm577SXk6OyGosRAQrbuE9zal1jvwk+TNUq8OOCU D26J753Q8DzewzLUnnVg5UtCGsAMlr1p2SZqz49BNQEvbkpvrQkSkasNJMPC8ggP+8IuD3kXksnxK ZIFUUgr11CMA1yioMzmmygE1+Q3/vqbBo0qvTX6D6LHqcZoXSGU3ROAXkCJoTsMYgrjOOJAKAoxL2 7KetstVIrlBNgjSDjI1VO9783258ew+jdPrPXDmggnhv9EOOz2omAqBUceT+s91jc+DBwXoRSBFt1 zvG+LQFg==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1su0DL-0000000FqUU-3An3; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 01:56:11 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 02:56:11 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [tree-wide] finally take no_llseek out Message-ID: <20240927015611.GT3550746@ZenIV> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: Al Viro no_llseek had been defined to NULL two years ago, in 868941b14441 "fs: remove no_llseek". To quote that commit, At -rc1 we'll need do a mechanical removal of no_llseek - git grep -l -w no_llseek | grep -v porting.rst | while read i; do sed -i '/\/d' $i done would do it. Unfortunately, that hadn't been done. Linus, could you do that now, so that we could finally put that thing to rest? All instances are of the form .llseek = no_llseek, so it's obviously safe (run the script, look at git diff and see yourself). Signed-off-by: Al Viro