From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
jack@suse.cz, dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
hare@suse.de, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
catherine.hoang@oracle.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 09:41:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240930164116.GP21853@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240930125438.2501050-7-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:54:37PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> Validate that an atomic write adheres to length/offset rules. Currently
> we can only write a single FS block.
>
> For an IOCB with IOCB_ATOMIC set to get as far as xfs_file_dio_write(),
> FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE will need to be set for the file; for this,
> ATOMICWRITES flags would also need to be set for the inode.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> index 412b1d71b52b..fa6a44b88ecc 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> @@ -688,6 +688,13 @@ xfs_file_dio_write(
> struct xfs_buftarg *target = xfs_inode_buftarg(ip);
> size_t count = iov_iter_count(from);
>
> + if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC) {
> + if (count != ip->i_mount->m_sb.sb_blocksize)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (!generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, from))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Does xfs_file_write_iter need a catch-all so that we don't fall back to
buffered write for a directio write that returns ENOTBLK?
if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) {
/*
* Allow a directio write to fall back to a buffered
* write *only* in the case that we're doing a reflink
* CoW. In all other directio scenarios we do not
* allow an operation to fall back to buffered mode.
*/
ret = xfs_file_dio_write(iocb, from);
if (ret != -ENOTBLK || (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_ATOMIC))
return ret;
}
IIRC iomap_dio_rw can return ENOTBLK if pagecache invalidation fails for
the region that we're trying to directio write.
--D
> +
> /* direct I/O must be aligned to device logical sector size */
> if ((iocb->ki_pos | count) & target->bt_logical_sectormask)
> return -EINVAL;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-30 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-30 12:54 [PATCH v6 0/7] block atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] block/fs: Pass an iocb to generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-01 8:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] fs: Export generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-01 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-09-30 15:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 8:05 ` John Garry
2024-10-01 14:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES John Garry
2024-09-30 16:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-09-30 16:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-01 12:05 ` John Garry
2024-10-01 13:35 ` John Garry
2024-10-03 12:48 ` John Garry
2024-10-03 13:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-03 13:19 ` John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-09-30 16:37 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 8:29 ` John Garry
2024-10-01 8:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-09-30 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-10-01 13:22 ` John Garry
2024-10-01 14:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-01 15:48 ` John Garry
2024-09-30 12:54 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry
2024-09-30 16:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240930164116.GP21853@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).