linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, dchinner@redhat.com,
	hch@lst.de, cem@kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	hare@suse.de, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	catherine.hoang@oracle.com, mcgrof@kernel.org,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/8] block/fs: Pass an iocb to generic_atomic_write_valid()
Date: Fri,  4 Oct 2024 09:22:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241004092254.3759210-2-john.g.garry@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241004092254.3759210-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

Darrick and Hannes both thought it better that generic_atomic_write_valid()
should be passed a struct iocb, and not just the member of that struct
which is referenced; see [0] and [1].

I think that makes a more generic and clean API, so make that change.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/680ce641-729b-4150-b875-531a98657682@suse.de/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240620212401.GA3058325@frogsfrogsfrogs/

Suggested-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
---
 block/fops.c       | 8 ++++----
 fs/read_write.c    | 4 ++--
 include/linux/fs.h | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
index e696ae53bf1e..968b47b615c4 100644
--- a/block/fops.c
+++ b/block/fops.c
@@ -35,13 +35,13 @@ static blk_opf_t dio_bio_write_op(struct kiocb *iocb)
 	return opf;
 }
 
-static bool blkdev_dio_invalid(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t pos,
+static bool blkdev_dio_invalid(struct block_device *bdev, struct kiocb *iocb,
 				struct iov_iter *iter, bool is_atomic)
 {
-	if (is_atomic && !generic_atomic_write_valid(iter, pos))
+	if (is_atomic && !generic_atomic_write_valid(iocb, iter))
 		return true;
 
-	return pos & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1) ||
+	return iocb->ki_pos & (bdev_logical_block_size(bdev) - 1) ||
 		!bdev_iter_is_aligned(bdev, iter);
 }
 
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static ssize_t blkdev_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	if (!iov_iter_count(iter))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (blkdev_dio_invalid(bdev, iocb->ki_pos, iter, is_atomic))
+	if (blkdev_dio_invalid(bdev, iocb, iter, is_atomic))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	nr_pages = bio_iov_vecs_to_alloc(iter, BIO_MAX_VECS + 1);
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 64dc24afdb3a..2c3263530828 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -1830,7 +1830,7 @@ int generic_file_rw_checks(struct file *file_in, struct file *file_out)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-bool generic_atomic_write_valid(struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t pos)
+bool generic_atomic_write_valid(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 {
 	size_t len = iov_iter_count(iter);
 
@@ -1840,7 +1840,7 @@ bool generic_atomic_write_valid(struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t pos)
 	if (!is_power_of_2(len))
 		return false;
 
-	if (!IS_ALIGNED(pos, len))
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(iocb->ki_pos, len))
 		return false;
 
 	return true;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index e3c603d01337..fbfa032d1d90 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -3721,6 +3721,6 @@ static inline bool vfs_empty_path(int dfd, const char __user *path)
 	return !c;
 }
 
-bool generic_atomic_write_valid(struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t pos);
+bool generic_atomic_write_valid(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter);
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_FS_H */
-- 
2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-04  9:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-04  9:22 [PATCH v7 0/8] block atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` John Garry [this message]
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] fs: Export generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] fs/block: Check for IOCB_DIRECT in generic_atomic_write_valid() John Garry
2024-10-04 12:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 12:45     ` John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] fs: iomap: Atomic write support John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] xfs: Support FS_XFLAG_ATOMICWRITES John Garry
2024-10-04 12:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-04 13:07     ` John Garry
2024-10-07  5:42       ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-13 21:06         ` John Garry
2024-10-16  0:52           ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] xfs: Support atomic write for statx John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] xfs: Validate atomic writes John Garry
2024-10-04  9:22 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] xfs: Support setting FMODE_CAN_ATOMIC_WRITE John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241004092254.3759210-2-john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).