From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] fs: port files to rcuref_long_t
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 23:28:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241005222836.GB4017910@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=whAwEqFKXjvYpnsq42JbE1GFoDR5LnmjjK_cOF4+nAhtg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 05, 2024 at 03:14:14PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There are probably other cases that just do "get_file()" on an
> existing 'struct file *" directly, but it's usually fairly hard to get
> users to refer to file pointers without giving an actual file
> descriptor number. But things like "split a vma" will do it (on the
> file that is mapped), and probably a few other cases, but I bet it
> really is just a few cases.
You can keep sending SCM_RIGHTS packets filled with references
to the same file, for example...
Anyway, which error would you return? EBADF? Because fget() callers
really expect a struct file reference or NULL. Sure, we can teach that
to return ERR_PTR() and deal with all callers (not that many these days),
but then there's fdget(). I've looked through those recently; more than
half treats "not open" as EBADF, but there's a bunch of EINVAL, etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-05 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-05 19:16 [PATCH RFC 0/4] fs: port files to rcuref_long_t Christian Brauner
2024-10-05 19:16 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] fs: protect backing files with rcu Christian Brauner
2024-10-05 19:16 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] types: add rcuref_long_t Christian Brauner
2024-10-05 19:16 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] rcuref: add rcuref_long_*() helpers Christian Brauner
2024-10-05 19:16 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] fs: port files to rcuref_long_t Christian Brauner
2024-10-05 21:42 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] " Linus Torvalds
2024-10-05 22:01 ` Al Viro
2024-10-05 22:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-05 22:28 ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-10-05 22:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-05 22:51 ` Al Viro
2024-10-06 9:55 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-05 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-06 10:21 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-06 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-07 7:37 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-06 9:48 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241005222836.GB4017910@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).