linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	 linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Stash overlay real upper file in backing_file
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 16:11:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007-trial-abbrechen-dc2976f10eb3@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxi0LKDi0VaYzDq0ja-Qn0D=Zg_wxraqnVomat29Z1QVuw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Oct 07, 2024 at 01:01:56PM GMT, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 12:38 PM Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Oct 2024 at 12:22, Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe it is more straightforward, I can go with that, but it
> > > feels like a waste not to use the space in backing_file,
> > > so let me first try to convince you otherwise.
> >
> > Is it not a much bigger waste to allocate backing_file with kmalloc()
> > instead of kmem_cache_alloc()?
> 
> Yes, much bigger...
> 
> Christian is still moving things around wrt lifetime of file and
> backing_file, so I do not want to intervene in the file_table.c space.

My plan was to just snatch your series on top of things once it's ready.
Sorry, I didn't get around to take a look. It seems even just closing
your eyes for a weekend to a computer screen is like opening flood
gates...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-10-07 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-06  8:23 [PATCH v2 0/4] Stash overlay real upper file in backing_file Amir Goldstein
2024-10-06  8:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ovl: do not open non-data lower file for fsync Amir Goldstein
2024-10-06  8:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ovl: stash upper real file in backing_file struct Amir Goldstein
2024-10-06 21:04   ` Al Viro
2024-10-07  3:03     ` Al Viro
2024-10-07  3:42       ` Al Viro
2024-10-07  6:34         ` Amir Goldstein
2024-10-06  8:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] ovl: convert ovl_real_fdget_path() callers to ovl_real_file_path() Amir Goldstein
2024-10-07  3:12   ` Al Viro
2024-10-07  6:36     ` Amir Goldstein
2024-10-06  8:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ovl: convert ovl_real_fdget() callers to ovl_real_file() Amir Goldstein
2024-10-07  9:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Stash overlay real upper file in backing_file Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-07 10:22   ` Amir Goldstein
2024-10-07 10:37     ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-07 11:01       ` Amir Goldstein
2024-10-07 11:15         ` Miklos Szeredi
2024-10-07 12:42           ` Amir Goldstein
2024-10-07 14:11         ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-10-07 14:21           ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241007-trial-abbrechen-dc2976f10eb3@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).