From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] xfs: IOMAP_ZERO and IOMAP_UNSHARE already hold invalidate_lock
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 10:59:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241008085939.266014-7-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241008085939.266014-1-hch@lst.de>
All XFS callers of iomap_zero_range and iomap_file_unshare already hold
invalidate_lock, so we can't take it again in
iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc.
Use the passed in flags argument to detect if we're called from a zero
or unshare operation and don't take the lock again in this case.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
index 4fa4d66dc37761..17170d9b9ff78a 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -1239,10 +1239,18 @@ xfs_buffered_write_iomap_end(
if (start_byte >= end_byte)
return 0;
- filemap_invalidate_lock(inode->i_mapping);
- iomap_write_delalloc_release(inode, start_byte, end_byte, flags, iomap,
- xfs_buffered_write_delalloc_punch);
- filemap_invalidate_unlock(inode->i_mapping);
+ /* For zeroing operations the callers already hold invalidate_lock. */
+ if (flags & (IOMAP_UNSHARE | IOMAP_ZERO)) {
+ rwsem_assert_held_write(&inode->i_mapping->invalidate_lock);
+ iomap_write_delalloc_release(inode, start_byte, end_byte, flags,
+ iomap, xfs_buffered_write_delalloc_punch);
+ } else {
+ filemap_invalidate_lock(inode->i_mapping);
+ iomap_write_delalloc_release(inode, start_byte, end_byte, flags,
+ iomap, xfs_buffered_write_delalloc_punch);
+ filemap_invalidate_unlock(inode->i_mapping);
+ }
+
return 0;
}
--
2.45.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 8:59 fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v5 Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 01/10] iomap: factor out a iomap_last_written_block helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: remove iomap_file_buffered_write_punch_delalloc Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 03/10] iomap: move locking out of iomap_write_delalloc_release Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfs: factor out a xfs_file_write_zero_eof helper Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfs: take XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL xfs_file_write_zero_eof Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-08 17:39 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfs: IOMAP_ZERO and IOMAP_UNSHARE already hold invalidate_lock Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfs: support the COW fork in xfs_bmap_punch_delalloc_range Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfs: share more code in xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfs: set IOMAP_F_SHARED for all COW fork allocations Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-08 8:59 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfs: punch delalloc extents from the COW fork for COW writes Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-11 10:59 ` fix stale delalloc punching for COW I/O v5 Carlos Maiolino
2024-10-15 11:09 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241008085939.266014-7-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).