From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2EAA1859; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 02:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729045535; cv=none; b=mi+xOg5qyE104gJ7OMkoTqSe0W/6lalIZlRoVvGfBaQt6W/sQir7OW9R6HBmc0bEKqZ+r0VGZTauvUtauVbdvL91fDpMxnBR0yv/l3k1Kldba5wF2kguGgP+fcms15zWfEW9Os9KL9QkbrV/eR+0m+xL/SEanSYotNkn8wBSFPE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729045535; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Jdptx5u4v/6E5gp57CYDnSwOan85kAY5Yrrs9yzpD4Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=XLEnAvh91LXNwC4q3C+NfzvJJNNCYZncjqVPrZHoMOav0aHWeRx+WzoY3jhM27qcHWcgloHHJBnGCO/KDnatdsNwBok9cZifUCSC/J3b3pwhwnjej0Dxilf5IAhynWiuxP9SK2fcFmxhyTmrnPD9+VX60TykYXnRxVpB69Vg4Po= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C4z5s/QI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C4z5s/QI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28189C4CEC6; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 02:25:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729045534; bh=Jdptx5u4v/6E5gp57CYDnSwOan85kAY5Yrrs9yzpD4Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=C4z5s/QIbi4scSq1/pFzjwCxhTENqAU9wNPNPZpWCHzS5yFKT4n8SBn2aWiPvJ2mF K0EsQ+KSQd/4eudF++qNxhI5ebGeGjOFvXqYuZoHt3J1MmhThPxJTLX34UNSmCWj0b kY6p1luRxUgDrgfWWYadT5kwu1dX2/O8XyQo5IXiKh7hSXFyqo2aXf00izrInqlKys CciCGTPMC0rjsEz1tLNQSFvi619GwtJlVTKA0zVlZUsPJhoD1z1t7bJ08QIMsLi9OT ktFu4XOAr1CxQCkWz0KvIjAXnX4mt09iqoPAZJDm8OMuyQ1w5Sga2UYVP+hhuS4sWu K0hMCuJF1zWAQ== Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 19:25:32 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: kernel test robot Cc: Christian Brauner , oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement) Message-ID: <20241016022532.GC1138@sol.localdomain> References: <202410151611.f4cd71f2-oliver.sang@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202410151611.f4cd71f2-oliver.sang@intel.com> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusing me. A negative regression would be an improvement. But that is not actually what is meant. Wondering if the wording can be fixed to remove the minus sign. - Eric