From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] getname_maybe_null() - the third variant of pathname copy-in
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 23:43:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241021224313.GC1350452@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241021170910.GB1350452@ZenIV>
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 06:09:10PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 02:39:58PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
>
> > > See #getname.fixup; on top of #base.getname and IMO worth folding into it.
> >
> > Yes, please fold so I can rebase my series on top of it.
>
> OK... What I have is #base.getname-fixed, with two commits - trivial
> "teach filename_lookup() to accept NULL" and introducing getname_maybe_null(),
> with fix folded in.
>
> #work.xattr2 and #work.statx2 are on top of that.
BTW, speaking of statx() - I would rather lift the call of cp_statx() out
of do_statx() and do_statx_fd() into the callers. Yes, that needs making
it non-static, due to io_uring; not a problem, IMO - it fits into the
"how do we copy internal objects to userland ones" family of helpers.
Another fun issue: for by-pathname case vfs_fstatat() ends up hitting
the same vfs_statx_path() as statx(2); however, for by-descriptor case
they do vfs_getattr() and vfs_statx_path() resp.
The difference is, vfs_statx_path() has
if (request_mask & STATX_MNT_ID_UNIQUE) {
stat->mnt_id = real_mount(path->mnt)->mnt_id_unique;
stat->result_mask |= STATX_MNT_ID_UNIQUE;
} else {
stat->mnt_id = real_mount(path->mnt)->mnt_id;
stat->result_mask |= STATX_MNT_ID;
}
if (path_mounted(path))
stat->attributes |= STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT;
stat->attributes_mask |= STATX_ATTR_MOUNT_ROOT;
/*
* If this is a block device inode, override the filesystem
* attributes with the block device specific parameters that need to be
* obtained from the bdev backing inode.
*/
if (S_ISBLK(stat->mode))
bdev_statx(path, stat, request_mask);
done after vfs_getattr(). Questions:
1) why is STATX_MNT_ID set without checking if it's in the mask passed to
the damn thing?
2) why, in the name of everything unholy, does statx() on /dev/weird_shite
trigger modprobe on that thing? Without even a permission check on it...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-09 4:03 [RFC][PATCH] getname_maybe_null() - the third variant of pathname copy-in Al Viro
2024-10-15 14:05 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-16 5:09 ` Al Viro
2024-10-16 8:32 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-16 14:00 ` Al Viro
2024-10-16 14:49 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-17 23:54 ` Al Viro
2024-10-18 11:06 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-18 16:51 ` Al Viro
2024-10-18 19:38 ` Al Viro
2024-10-19 5:03 ` Al Viro
2024-10-19 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-19 17:11 ` Al Viro
2024-10-19 17:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-10-21 12:38 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-21 12:39 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-21 17:09 ` Al Viro
2024-10-21 22:43 ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-10-22 8:49 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-30 6:37 ` Al Viro
2024-10-21 12:47 ` Christian Brauner
2024-10-21 17:05 ` Al Viro
2024-10-21 12:36 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241021224313.GC1350452@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).