From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE9C1E00A2 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 22:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729721178; cv=none; b=abSsM2c2QOdPtW0hUaDGZ1QJcbg/gmXeGVAw3Yfh9N3izv+FRofZt0XuUntE4vK51wTZDd0IGKWzpSkeqI8uAV/e+uAn+ucn7+mO220AsMC7+WQXHh9tQubBC9UOi4dvWh96hDAH/C2a2iuFVyLSW55wDeMvVjiO56UPy1XWQzY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729721178; c=relaxed/simple; bh=984GCKVsYEArTj3PUCgwkFaD949QlJM45EbYy2MZ0NE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BCPdVgi1EGev7LE4hFKq0o/YAZCMDEjTFf9JgB/LV0eiaDOkCxPxjUTgHpnpLv3CNdIi608kytEGQAGESitw5zFe3W/JGEjPZJ1EJwkXVijo6f71JhFahnU8iWNHsOoBBvQGDhOX4/fzoBuU3Udy5aBKUNxHrqL+SMY2KQVe70c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b=CfolJoT7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="CfolJoT7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1729721171; bh=J36rfoeTlZh3Nkp+SSjUhA4ZxZSawyhuFKBwkzLttAA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=CfolJoT7PkGz5agQKGrg8gSHa6CoGx4tJ7LMCZiPlytQF+9Bpgr9N7QYvaA+ydXm7 Q5iR9tcYlaEfBi6UBA1m/CdUnuJbEZMKx7ekUW5nBr7m5pWKfPrvythyY0ViKcRs3j oKnjQ2Pq2eQKF2kAqvgA3OT52gBtsrv2S37OssF9nt6FK0gUs4nlKSPEM523ywoMmS RPkk7r2DeOeYqijrJnXaLfSzVx6EXAkjj0elqiH50p5aWXhgiGC9o2kdYeze/vCr0S uwaIEZ/Fk9THX0ZFX12OcMXicNKdG+qUjFNBAEcJfEu5NCf4UpxxsWhKVptfEVJDzz f/Cvg/K8mdzSA== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4XYjmg3QZWz4w2L; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:06:11 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:06:11 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: Christian Brauner , "Darrick J. Wong" , sunjunchao2870@gmail.com, Linux Filesystem Development List , Christian Brauner Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] generic/564 is failing in fs-next Message-ID: <20241024090611.0cff2423@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20241023194253.GH3204734@mit.edu> References: <20241018162837.GA3307207@mit.edu> <20241019161601.GJ21836@frogsfrogsfrogs> <20241021-anstecken-fortfahren-4dd7b79a5f45@brauner> <20241023194253.GH3204734@mit.edu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/aUo4yl/z7S6rEBmX8VZUQ+V"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 --Sig_/aUo4yl/z7S6rEBmX8VZUQ+V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ted, On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 15:42:53 -0400 "Theodore Ts'o" wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 02:49:54PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/c= ommit/fs/read_write.c?h=3Dfs-next&id=3D0f0f217df68fd72d91d2de6e85a6dd80fa1f= 5c95 > > >=20 > > > To Mr. Sun: did you see these regressions when you tested this patch?= =20 > >=20 > > So we should drop this patch for now. =20 >=20 > My most recent fs-next testing is still showing this failure, and > looking at the most recent fs-next branch,=20 >=20 > vfs: Fix implicit conversion problem when testing overflow case >=20 > still appears to be in the tree. Can we please get this dropped? > Thanks!! I have reverted that commit from the fs-next and linux-next trees for today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/aUo4yl/z7S6rEBmX8VZUQ+V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmcZc1MACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gy3dwf/SmYXSo0ctMdPXPjG4VSM4dHBM7OAWXQ1pUj0AZLEldV+UqAB9rDbgMSh mM/40JzVID3JiMm847HH0ePHiH99OB+k7iaSFN3mb+tWIxaFC8mokSXhza+nkun8 xCRsKyeqRciUYkjVRUqPbqAji7T89jb52jLEjDU09w6YlL6ermRc+YffSIwZ8d5F JUOy1+lirr6zieJbAlbr1W0fmadIT7Quitefs4Z2l1yAu7qOp0SJ91VOUCqq07sq cndbOMCLk5I6vrayzx2lSizorWx/w9pQESfsQT4oL4VVUjVkOfaGkjVJOfJz8iqr hjyOQwnZfMswlOd/GspxxXrM3D6D6w== =R8Nc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/aUo4yl/z7S6rEBmX8VZUQ+V--