From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] iomap: lift zeroed mapping handling into iomap_zero_range()
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 07:42:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241108124246.198489-3-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108124246.198489-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
In preparation for special handling of subranges, lift the zeroed
mapping logic from the iterator into the caller. Since this puts the
pagecache dirty check and flushing in the same place, streamline the
comments a bit as well.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 64 +++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index ef0b68bccbb6..a78b5b9b3df3 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -1350,40 +1350,12 @@ static inline int iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(struct iomap_iter *i)
return filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, i->pos, end);
}
-static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero,
- bool *range_dirty)
+static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
{
- const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
loff_t pos = iter->pos;
loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
loff_t written = 0;
- /*
- * We must zero subranges of unwritten mappings that might be dirty in
- * pagecache from previous writes. We only know whether the entire range
- * was clean or not, however, and dirty folios may have been written
- * back or reclaimed at any point after mapping lookup.
- *
- * The easiest way to deal with this is to flush pagecache to trigger
- * any pending unwritten conversions and then grab the updated extents
- * from the fs. The flush may change the current mapping, so mark it
- * stale for the iterator to remap it for the next pass to handle
- * properly.
- *
- * Note that holes are treated the same as unwritten because zero range
- * is (ab)used for partial folio zeroing in some cases. Hole backed
- * post-eof ranges can be dirtied via mapped write and the flush
- * triggers writeback time post-eof zeroing.
- */
- if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE || srcmap->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
- if (*range_dirty) {
- *range_dirty = false;
- return iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(iter);
- }
- /* range is clean and already zeroed, nothing to do */
- return length;
- }
-
do {
struct folio *folio;
int status;
@@ -1433,24 +1405,32 @@ iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
bool range_dirty;
/*
- * Zero range wants to skip pre-zeroed (i.e. unwritten) mappings, but
- * pagecache must be flushed to ensure stale data from previous
- * buffered writes is not exposed. A flush is only required for certain
- * types of mappings, but checking pagecache after mapping lookup is
- * racy with writeback and reclaim.
+ * Zero range can skip mappings that are zero on disk so long as
+ * pagecache is clean. If pagecache was dirty prior to zero range, the
+ * mapping converts on writeback completion and so must be zeroed.
*
- * Therefore, check the entire range first and pass along whether any
- * part of it is dirty. If so and an underlying mapping warrants it,
- * flush the cache at that point. This trades off the occasional false
- * positive (and spurious flush, if the dirty data and mapping don't
- * happen to overlap) for simplicity in handling a relatively uncommon
- * situation.
+ * The simplest way to deal with this across a range is to flush
+ * pagecache and process the updated mappings. To avoid an unconditional
+ * flush, check pagecache state and only flush if dirty and the fs
+ * returns a mapping that might convert on writeback.
*/
range_dirty = filemap_range_needs_writeback(inode->i_mapping,
pos, pos + len - 1);
+ while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) {
+ const struct iomap *s = iomap_iter_srcmap(&iter);
+
+ if (s->type == IOMAP_HOLE || s->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
+ loff_t p = iomap_length(&iter);
+ if (range_dirty) {
+ range_dirty = false;
+ p = iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(&iter);
+ }
+ iter.processed = p;
+ continue;
+ }
- while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
- iter.processed = iomap_zero_iter(&iter, did_zero, &range_dirty);
+ iter.processed = iomap_zero_iter(&iter, did_zero);
+ }
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_zero_range);
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-08 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-08 12:42 [PATCH v3 0/4] iomap: zero range flush fixes Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] iomap: reset per-iter state on non-error iter advances Brian Foster
2024-11-09 3:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-11 5:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-12 13:59 ` Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2024-11-09 3:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] iomap: lift zeroed mapping handling into iomap_zero_range() Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-12 13:59 ` Brian Foster
2024-11-11 6:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-12 14:00 ` Brian Foster
2024-11-15 14:53 ` Brian Foster
2024-11-15 17:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-15 19:31 ` Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] iomap: elide flush from partial eof zero range Brian Foster
2024-11-09 3:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-11 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] iomap: warn on zero range of a post-eof folio Brian Foster
2024-11-09 3:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-12 14:01 ` Brian Foster
2024-11-11 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241108124246.198489-3-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox