public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/4] iomap: warn on zero range of a post-eof folio
Date: Fri,  8 Nov 2024 07:42:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241108124246.198489-5-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241108124246.198489-1-bfoster@redhat.com>

iomap_zero_range() uses buffered writes for manual zeroing, no
longer updates i_size for such writes, but is still explicitly
called for post-eof ranges. The historical use case for this is
zeroing post-eof speculative preallocation on extending writes from
XFS. However, XFS also recently changed to convert all post-eof
delalloc mappings to unwritten in the iomap_begin() handler, which
means it now never expects manual zeroing of post-eof mappings. In
other words, all post-eof mappings should be reported as holes or
unwritten.

This is a subtle dependency that can be hard to detect if violated
because associated codepaths are likely to update i_size after folio
locks are dropped, but before writeback happens to occur. For
example, if XFS reverts back to some form of manual zeroing of
post-eof blocks on write extension, writeback of those zeroed folios
will now race with the presumed i_size update from the subsequent
buffered write.

Since iomap_zero_range() can't correctly zero post-eof mappings
beyond EOF without updating i_size, warn if this ever occurs. This
serves as minimal indication that if this use case is reintroduced
by a filesystem, iomap_zero_range() might need to reconsider i_size
updates for write extending use cases.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 7f40234a301e..e18830e4809b 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -1354,6 +1354,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
 {
 	loff_t pos = iter->pos;
 	loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
+	loff_t isize = iter->inode->i_size;
 	loff_t written = 0;
 
 	do {
@@ -1369,6 +1370,8 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
 		if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE)
 			break;
 
+		/* warn about zeroing folios beyond eof that won't write back */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_pos(folio) > isize);
 		offset = offset_in_folio(folio, pos);
 		if (bytes > folio_size(folio) - offset)
 			bytes = folio_size(folio) - offset;
-- 
2.47.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-08 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-08 12:42 [PATCH v3 0/4] iomap: zero range flush fixes Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] iomap: reset per-iter state on non-error iter advances Brian Foster
2024-11-09  3:00   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-11  5:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-12 13:59     ` Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] iomap: lift zeroed mapping handling into iomap_zero_range() Brian Foster
2024-11-09  3:01   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-12 13:59     ` Brian Foster
2024-11-11  6:03   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-12 14:00     ` Brian Foster
2024-11-15 14:53       ` Brian Foster
2024-11-15 17:02         ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-15 19:31           ` Brian Foster
2024-11-08 12:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] iomap: elide flush from partial eof zero range Brian Foster
2024-11-09  3:03   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-11  6:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-08 12:42 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2024-11-09  3:06   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] iomap: warn on zero range of a post-eof folio Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-12 14:01     ` Brian Foster
2024-11-11  6:06   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241108124246.198489-5-bfoster@redhat.com \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox