From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Subject: [MEH PATCH] fs: sort out a stale comment about races between fd alloc and dup2
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 16:47:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241205154743.1586584-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> (raw)
It claims the issue is only relevant for shared descriptor tables which
is of no concern for POSIX (but then is POSIX of concern to anyone
today?), which I presume predates standarized threading.
The comment also mentions the following systems:
- OpenBSD installing a larval file -- this remains accurate
- FreeBSD returning EBADF -- not accurate, the system uses the same
idea as OpenBSD
- NetBSD "deadlocks in amusing ways" -- their solution looks
Solaris-inspired (not a compliment) and I would not be particularly
surprised if it indeed deadlocked, in amusing ways or otherwise
I don't believe mentioning any of these adds anything and the statement
about the issue not being POSIX-relevant is outdated.
dup2 description in POSIX still does not mention the problem.
Just shorten the comment and be done with it.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
---
I'm pretty sure the comment adds nothing in the current form, but I'm
not going to argue about it.
fs/file.c | 14 +++-----------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index d065a24980da..ad8aabc08122 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -1258,17 +1258,9 @@ __releases(&files->file_lock)
/*
* We need to detect attempts to do dup2() over allocated but still
- * not finished descriptor. NB: OpenBSD avoids that at the price of
- * extra work in their equivalent of fget() - they insert struct
- * file immediately after grabbing descriptor, mark it larval if
- * more work (e.g. actual opening) is needed and make sure that
- * fget() treats larval files as absent. Potentially interesting,
- * but while extra work in fget() is trivial, locking implications
- * and amount of surgery on open()-related paths in VFS are not.
- * FreeBSD fails with -EBADF in the same situation, NetBSD "solution"
- * deadlocks in rather amusing ways, AFAICS. All of that is out of
- * scope of POSIX or SUS, since neither considers shared descriptor
- * tables and this condition does not arise without those.
+ * not finished descriptor.
+ *
+ * POSIX is silent on the issue, we return -EBUSY.
*/
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
fd = array_index_nospec(fd, fdt->max_fds);
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-05 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-05 15:47 Mateusz Guzik [this message]
2024-12-06 12:13 ` [MEH PATCH] fs: sort out a stale comment about races between fd alloc and dup2 Christian Brauner
2024-12-09 19:56 ` Al Viro
2024-12-10 4:48 ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-12-10 10:18 ` Christian Brauner
2024-12-10 18:15 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241205154743.1586584-1-mjguzik@gmail.com \
--to=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox