From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com,
hch@lst.de, ritesh.list@gmail.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on atomic writes
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 16:41:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250108004103.GA1306365@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250102140411.14617-4-john.g.garry@oracle.com>
On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 02:04:07PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>
> Filesystems like ext4 can submit writes in multiples of blocksizes.
> But we still can't allow the writes to be split. Hence let's check if
> the iomap_length() is same as iter->len or not.
>
> It is the role of the FS to ensure that a single mapping may be created
> for an atomic write. The FS will also continue to check size and alignment
> legality.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
> jpg: Tweak commit message
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Fine with me.
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/iomap/direct-io.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index 18c888f0c11f..6510bb5d5a6f 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static loff_t iomap_dio_bio_iter(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
> size_t copied = 0;
> size_t orig_count;
>
> - if (atomic && length != fs_block_size)
> + if (atomic && length != iter->len)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if ((pos | length) & (bdev_logical_block_size(iomap->bdev) - 1) ||
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-08 0:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-02 14:04 [PATCH v3 0/7] large atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] iomap: Increase iomap_dio_zero() size limit John Garry
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] iomap: Add zero unwritten mappings dio support John Garry
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on atomic writes John Garry
2025-01-08 0:41 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] xfs: Add extent zeroing support for " John Garry
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-01-08 0:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] xfs: Add RT atomic write unit max to xfs_mount John Garry
2025-01-08 0:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-01-02 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] xfs: Update xfs_get_atomic_write_attr() for large atomic writes John Garry
2025-01-08 0:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250108004103.GA1306365@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox