From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Error in generic/397 test script?
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 09:53:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250120175343.GC2268@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250120174627.GB2268@sol.localdomain>
On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 09:46:29AM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 05:41:40PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > > It would be enlightening to understand what the issue was here. Did you
> > > explicitly disable these options, overriding the imply, without providing a
> > > replacement? Or was this another issue specific to unmerged kernel patches?
> >
> > I enabled CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION in addition to the options I normally use, but
> > didn't realise I needed to enable CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS as well.
> >
> > David
> >
>
> So you had an explicit '# CONFIG_CRYPTO_XTS is not set' somewhere in your
> kconfig that overrode the imply, right?
>
> Wondering if the following commit should maybe be reconsidered:
>
> commit a0fc20333ee4bac1147c4cf75dea098c26671a2f
> Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Date: Wed Apr 21 09:55:10 2021 +0200
>
> fscrypt: relax Kconfig dependencies for crypto API algorithms
>
> Even if FS encryption has strict functional dependencies on various
> crypto algorithms and chaining modes. those dependencies could potentially
> be satisified by other implementations than the generic ones, and no link
> time dependency exists on the 'depends on' claused defined by
> CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION_ALGS.
>
> So let's relax these clauses to 'imply', so that the default behavior
> is still to pull in those generic algorithms, but in a way that permits
> them to be disabled again in Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
By the way, CRYPTO_XTS is basically useless. E.g. on x86_64 you really want
CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL. I should probably throw in a selection of that (similar to
what CONFIG_WIREGUARD does where it selects optimized code for each arch),
though I've been hoping for this to be properly solved at the crypto API level.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-20 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-20 12:32 Error in generic/397 test script? David Howells
2025-01-20 14:20 ` David Howells
2025-01-20 15:43 ` David Howells
2025-01-20 17:25 ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-20 17:41 ` David Howells
2025-01-20 17:46 ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-20 17:53 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-01-20 17:19 ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-20 17:17 ` Eric Biggers
2025-01-20 17:26 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250120175343.GC2268@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=amarkuze@redhat.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox