public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] iomap: split out iomap check and reset logic from iter advance
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:34:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250122133434.535192-2-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250122133434.535192-1-bfoster@redhat.com>

In preparation for more granular iomap_iter advancing, break out
some of the logic associated with higher level iteration from
iomap_advance_iter(). Specifically, factor the iomap reset code into
a separate helper and lift the iomap.length check into the calling
code, similar to how ->iomap_end() calls are handled.

Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
 fs/iomap/iter.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/iter.c b/fs/iomap/iter.c
index 3790918646af..731ea7267f27 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/iter.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/iter.c
@@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
 #include <linux/iomap.h>
 #include "trace.h"
 
+static inline void iomap_iter_reset_iomap(struct iomap_iter *iter)
+{
+	iter->processed = 0;
+	memset(&iter->iomap, 0, sizeof(iter->iomap));
+	memset(&iter->srcmap, 0, sizeof(iter->srcmap));
+}
+
 /*
  * Advance to the next range we need to map.
  *
@@ -14,32 +21,24 @@
  * processed - it was aborted because the extent the iomap spanned may have been
  * changed during the operation. In this case, the iteration behaviour is to
  * remap the unprocessed range of the iter, and that means we may need to remap
- * even when we've made no progress (i.e. iter->processed = 0). Hence the
- * "finished iterating" case needs to distinguish between
- * (processed = 0) meaning we are done and (processed = 0 && stale) meaning we
- * need to remap the entire remaining range.
+ * even when we've made no progress (i.e. count = 0). Hence the "finished
+ * iterating" case needs to distinguish between (count = 0) meaning we are done
+ * and (count = 0 && stale) meaning we need to remap the entire remaining range.
  */
-static inline int iomap_iter_advance(struct iomap_iter *iter)
+static inline int iomap_iter_advance(struct iomap_iter *iter, s64 count)
 {
 	bool stale = iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE;
 	int ret = 1;
 
-	/* handle the previous iteration (if any) */
-	if (iter->iomap.length) {
-		if (iter->processed < 0)
-			return iter->processed;
-		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(iter->processed > iomap_length(iter)))
-			return -EIO;
-		iter->pos += iter->processed;
-		iter->len -= iter->processed;
-		if (!iter->len || (!iter->processed && !stale))
-			ret = 0;
-	}
+	if (count < 0)
+		return count;
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(count > iomap_length(iter)))
+		return -EIO;
+	iter->pos += count;
+	iter->len -= count;
+	if (!iter->len || (!count && !stale))
+		ret = 0;
 
-	/* clear the per iteration state */
-	iter->processed = 0;
-	memset(&iter->iomap, 0, sizeof(iter->iomap));
-	memset(&iter->srcmap, 0, sizeof(iter->srcmap));
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -82,10 +81,14 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
+	/* advance and clear state from the previous iteration */
 	trace_iomap_iter(iter, ops, _RET_IP_);
-	ret = iomap_iter_advance(iter);
-	if (ret <= 0)
-		return ret;
+	if (iter->iomap.length) {
+		ret = iomap_iter_advance(iter, iter->processed);
+		iomap_iter_reset_iomap(iter);
+		if (ret <= 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
 
 	ret = ops->iomap_begin(iter->inode, iter->pos, iter->len, iter->flags,
 			       &iter->iomap, &iter->srcmap);
-- 
2.47.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-22 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-22 13:34 [PATCH v2 0/7] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance Brian Foster
2025-01-22 13:34 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iomap: factor out iomap length helper Brian Foster
2025-01-28  5:26   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 13:53     ` Brian Foster
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iomap: refactor iter and advance continuation logic Brian Foster
2025-01-28  5:34   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 13:55     ` Brian Foster
2025-01-29  5:50       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances Brian Foster
2025-01-28  5:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iomap: advance the iter directly on buffered writes Brian Foster
2025-01-28  5:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iomap: advance the iter directly on unshare range Brian Foster
2025-01-28  5:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 13:57     ` Brian Foster
2025-01-29  5:58       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 17:59     ` Brian Foster
2025-01-29  5:56       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-29 16:40         ` Brian Foster
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range Brian Foster
2025-01-28  5:40   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250122133434.535192-2-bfoster@redhat.com \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox