linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	WangYuli <wangyuli@uniontech.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@amd.com>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still full
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:49:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250204134821.GB6031@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7ace642f-e269-49ad-9d32-53c7ffa00681@amd.com>

On 02/03, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>
> With the below patch on mainline, I see more improvements for a
> modified version of sched-messaging (sched-messaging is same as
> hackbench as you noted on the parallel thread) that uses
> pipe2(O_NOATIME)

Thanks,

> The original regression is still noticeable despite the improvements
> but if folks believe this is a corner case with the original changes
> exhibited by sched-messaging, I'll just continue further testing with
> the new baseline.

I still don't know if we should worry or not... But if we want to try
to improve the wake_writer logic, then I think it makes sense to cleanup
this code first.

IMO the (untested) patch below makes sense regardless, I am going to send
it after I grep fs/splice.c a bit more.

a194dfe6e6f6f ("pipe: Rearrange sequence in pipe_write() to preallocate slot")
changed pipe_write() to increment pipe->head in advance.  IIUC to avoid the
race with the post_one_notification()-like code which can add another buffer
under pipe->rd_wait.lock without pipe->mutex.

This is no longer necessary after c73be61cede ("pipe: Add general notification
queue support"), pipe_write() checks pipe_has_watch_queue() and returns -EXDEV
at the start. And can't help in any case, pipe_write() no longer takes this
spinlock.

Change pipe_write() to call copy_page_from_iter() first and do nothing if it
fails. This way pipe_write() can't add a zero-sized bufer and we can simplify
pipe_read() which currently has to handle this very unlikely case.

Oleg.

diff --git a/fs/pipe.c b/fs/pipe.c
index baaa8c0817f1..0816070a5e7a 100644
--- a/fs/pipe.c
+++ b/fs/pipe.c
@@ -312,6 +312,7 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 			size_t written;
 			int error;
 
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(chars == 0);
 			if (chars > total_len) {
 				if (buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_WHOLE) {
 					if (ret == 0)
@@ -365,29 +366,9 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 			break;
 		}
 		mutex_unlock(&pipe->mutex);
-
 		/*
 		 * We only get here if we didn't actually read anything.
 		 *
-		 * However, we could have seen (and removed) a zero-sized
-		 * pipe buffer, and might have made space in the buffers
-		 * that way.
-		 *
-		 * You can't make zero-sized pipe buffers by doing an empty
-		 * write (not even in packet mode), but they can happen if
-		 * the writer gets an EFAULT when trying to fill a buffer
-		 * that already got allocated and inserted in the buffer
-		 * array.
-		 *
-		 * So we still need to wake up any pending writers in the
-		 * _very_ unlikely case that the pipe was full, but we got
-		 * no data.
-		 */
-		if (unlikely(wake_writer))
-			wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wr_wait, EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM);
-		kill_fasync(&pipe->fasync_writers, SIGIO, POLL_OUT);
-
-		/*
 		 * But because we didn't read anything, at this point we can
 		 * just return directly with -ERESTARTSYS if we're interrupted,
 		 * since we've done any required wakeups and there's no need
@@ -396,7 +377,6 @@ pipe_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 		if (wait_event_interruptible_exclusive(pipe->rd_wait, pipe_readable(pipe)) < 0)
 			return -ERESTARTSYS;
 
-		wake_writer = false;
 		wake_next_reader = true;
 		mutex_lock(&pipe->mutex);
 	}
@@ -524,31 +504,25 @@ pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
 				pipe->tmp_page = page;
 			}
 
-			/* Allocate a slot in the ring in advance and attach an
-			 * empty buffer.  If we fault or otherwise fail to use
-			 * it, either the reader will consume it or it'll still
-			 * be there for the next write.
-			 */
-			pipe->head = head + 1;
+			copied = copy_page_from_iter(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE, from);
+			if (unlikely(copied < PAGE_SIZE && iov_iter_count(from))) {
+				if (!ret)
+					ret = -EFAULT;
+				break;
+			}
 
+			pipe->head = head + 1;
+			pipe->tmp_page = NULL;
 			/* Insert it into the buffer array */
 			buf = &pipe->bufs[head & mask];
 			buf->page = page;
 			buf->ops = &anon_pipe_buf_ops;
 			buf->offset = 0;
-			buf->len = 0;
 			if (is_packetized(filp))
 				buf->flags = PIPE_BUF_FLAG_PACKET;
 			else
 				buf->flags = PIPE_BUF_FLAG_CAN_MERGE;
-			pipe->tmp_page = NULL;
 
-			copied = copy_page_from_iter(page, 0, PAGE_SIZE, from);
-			if (unlikely(copied < PAGE_SIZE && iov_iter_count(from))) {
-				if (!ret)
-					ret = -EFAULT;
-				break;
-			}
 			ret += copied;
 			buf->len = copied;
 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-02 14:07 [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still full Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-02 16:20 ` WangYuli
2025-01-02 16:46   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-04  8:42 ` Christian Brauner
2025-01-31  9:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-01-31 13:23   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-31 20:06   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-02 17:01     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-02 18:39       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-02 19:32         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-04 11:17         ` Christian Brauner
2025-02-03  9:05       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-02-04 13:49         ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2025-02-24  9:26 ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-24 14:24   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-24 18:36     ` Linus Torvalds
2025-02-25 14:26       ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-25 11:57     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26  5:55       ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-26 11:38         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-26 17:56           ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-26 18:12             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-03 13:00       ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-03-03 15:46         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-03 17:18           ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-02-26 13:18     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-26 13:21       ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-26 17:16         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-27 16:18       ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-27 16:34         ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-27 21:12         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-28  5:58           ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-02-28 14:30             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-28 16:33               ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-03  9:46                 ` Sapkal, Swapnil
2025-03-03 14:37                   ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 14:51                     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 15:31                       ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-03 17:54                         ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 18:11                           ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-03 18:33                             ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 18:55                               ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-03 19:06                                 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-03-03 20:27                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-03 20:46                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-04  5:31                                     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-04  6:32                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-04 12:54                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-04 13:25                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-04 18:28                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-04 22:11                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-05  4:40                                         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-05  4:52                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-04 13:51                                     ` [PATCH] fs/pipe: Read pipe->{head,tail} atomically outside pipe->mutex K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-04 18:36                                       ` Alexey Gladkov
2025-03-04 19:03                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-05 15:31                                     ` [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still full Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-05 16:50                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-06  9:48                                         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-06 14:42                                           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-05 16:40                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-06  8:35                                       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-06 17:59                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-06  9:28                                       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-06 11:39                                       ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] pipe: Convert pipe->{head,tail} to unsigned short K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 11:39                                         ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] fs/pipe: Limit the slots in pipe_resize_ring() K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 12:28                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-06 15:26                                             ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 11:39                                         ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] fs/splice: Atomically read pipe->{head,tail} in opipe_prep() K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 11:39                                         ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] treewide: pipe: Convert all references to pipe->{head,tail,max_usage,ring_size} to unsigned short K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 12:32                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-06 12:41                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-06 15:33                                               ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-06 18:04                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-06 14:27                                             ` Rasmus Villemoes
2025-03-03 18:32                           ` [PATCH] pipe_read: don't wake up the writer if the pipe is still full K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-04  5:22                             ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-03 16:49                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-04  5:06                   ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-04  5:35                     ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-04 10:29                       ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-04 12:34                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-04 23:35                           ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-04 23:49                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-05  4:56                               ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-05 11:44                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-05 22:46                                   ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-06  9:30                                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-07  6:08                                       ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-07  6:24                                         ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-07 10:46                                           ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-07 11:29                                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-07 12:34                                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-07 23:56                                                 ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-09 14:01                                                   ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-03-09 17:02                                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-10 10:49                                                     ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-10 11:09                                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-10 11:37                                                         ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-10 12:43                                                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-10 23:33                                                             ` Hillf Danton
2025-03-11  0:26                                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2025-03-11  6:54                                                               ` Oleg Nesterov
     [not found]                                                               ` <20250311112922.3342-1-hdanton@sina.com>
2025-03-11 11:53                                                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-07 11:26                                         ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-27 12:50   ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-27 13:52     ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-02-27 15:59     ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-02-27 16:28       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250204134821.GB6031@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=swapnil.sapkal@amd.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wangyuli@uniontech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).