From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 08:58:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250205135821.178256-11-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250205135821.178256-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
Modify zero range to advance the iter directly. Replace the local pos
and length calculations with direct advances and loop based on iter
state instead.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index f953bf66beb1..ec227b45f3aa 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -1345,17 +1345,16 @@ static inline int iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(struct iomap_iter *i)
static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
{
- loff_t pos = iter->pos;
- loff_t length = iomap_length(iter);
- loff_t written = 0;
+ u64 bytes = iomap_length(iter);
+ int status;
do {
struct folio *folio;
- int status;
size_t offset;
- size_t bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, length);
+ loff_t pos = iter->pos;
bool ret;
+ bytes = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, bytes);
status = iomap_write_begin(iter, pos, bytes, &folio);
if (status)
return status;
@@ -1376,14 +1375,14 @@ static loff_t iomap_zero_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, bool *did_zero)
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ret))
return -EIO;
- pos += bytes;
- length -= bytes;
- written += bytes;
- } while (length > 0);
+ status = iomap_iter_advance(iter, &bytes);
+ if (status)
+ break;
+ } while (bytes > 0);
if (did_zero)
*did_zero = true;
- return written;
+ return status;
}
int
@@ -1436,11 +1435,14 @@ iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
if (srcmap->type == IOMAP_HOLE ||
srcmap->type == IOMAP_UNWRITTEN) {
- loff_t proc = iomap_length(&iter);
+ s64 proc;
if (range_dirty) {
range_dirty = false;
proc = iomap_zero_iter_flush_and_stale(&iter);
+ } else {
+ u64 length = iomap_length(&iter);
+ proc = iomap_iter_advance(&iter, &length);
}
iter.processed = proc;
continue;
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-05 13:58 [PATCH v5 00/10] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] iomap: factor out iomap length helper Brian Foster
2025-02-05 18:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] iomap: split out iomap check and reset logic from iter advance Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] iomap: refactor iomap_iter() length check and tracepoint Brian Foster
2025-02-05 18:50 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] iomap: lift error code check out of iomap_iter_advance() Brian Foster
2025-02-05 18:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] iomap: lift iter termination logic from iomap_iter_advance() Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:00 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 20:25 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] iomap: export iomap_iter_advance() and return remaining length Brian Foster
2025-02-05 18:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 20:25 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:10 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 20:26 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on buffered writes Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:17 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on unshare range Brian Foster
2025-02-05 19:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 20:27 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-05 20:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-05 13:58 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-02-05 19:15 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250205135821.178256-11-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).