From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
jack@suse.cz, cem@kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
dchinner@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
catherine.hoang@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/12] xfs: add helpers to compute log item overhead
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2025 16:21:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250408232131.GK6307@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z_WoUawfJ_QFF5kP@dread.disaster.area>
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 08:50:57AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 10:41:59AM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> > From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> >
> > Add selected helpers to estimate the transaction reservation required to
> > write various log intent and buffer items to the log. These helpers
> > will be used by the online repair code for more precise estimations of
> > how much work can be done in a single transaction.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c | 6 +++---
> > fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.h | 4 ++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.h | 3 +++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_buf_item.h | 3 +++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.h | 3 +++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_log_cil.c | 4 +---
> > fs/xfs/xfs_log_priv.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_refcount_item.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_refcount_item.h | 3 +++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_rmap_item.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > fs/xfs/xfs_rmap_item.h | 3 +++
> > 14 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > index 13d00c7166e1..ce1393bd3561 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.c
> > @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ xfs_buf_log_overhead(void)
> > * will be changed in a transaction. size is used to tell how many
> > * bytes should be reserved per item.
> > */
> > -STATIC uint
> > +uint
> > xfs_calc_buf_res(
> > uint nbufs,
> > uint size)
> > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ xfs_allocfree_block_count(
> > * in the same transaction as an allocation or a free, so we compute them
> > * separately.
> > */
> > -static unsigned int
> > +unsigned int
> > xfs_refcountbt_block_count(
> > struct xfs_mount *mp,
> > unsigned int num_ops)
> > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ xfs_rtrefcountbt_block_count(
> > * additional to the records and pointers that fit inside the inode
> > * forks.
> > */
> > -STATIC uint
> > +uint
> > xfs_calc_inode_res(
> > struct xfs_mount *mp,
> > uint ninodes)
> > diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.h b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.h
> > index 0554b9d775d2..e76052028cc9 100644
> > --- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.h
> > +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_trans_resv.h
> > @@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ struct xfs_trans_resv {
> >
> > void xfs_trans_resv_calc(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_trans_resv *resp);
> > uint xfs_allocfree_block_count(struct xfs_mount *mp, uint num_ops);
> > +unsigned int xfs_refcountbt_block_count(struct xfs_mount *mp,
> > + unsigned int num_ops);
> > +uint xfs_calc_buf_res(uint nbufs, uint size);
> > +uint xfs_calc_inode_res(struct xfs_mount *mp, uint ninodes);
>
> Why are these exported? They aren't used in this patch, and any code
> that doing calculate log reservation calculation should really be
> placed in xfs_trans_resv.c along with all the existing log
> reservation calculations...
I've redone this in a different manner, will send a full patchset after
it runs through QA.
--D
> -Dave
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-08 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-08 10:41 [PATCH v6 00/12] large atomic writes for xfs John Garry
2025-04-08 10:41 ` [PATCH v6 01/12] fs: add atomic write unit max opt to statx John Garry
2025-04-09 2:23 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-08 10:41 ` [PATCH v6 02/12] xfs: add helpers to compute log item overhead John Garry
2025-04-08 22:50 ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-08 23:21 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-04-09 2:25 ` [PATCH v6.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09 2:25 ` [PATCH v6.1 RFC 02.1/12] xfs: add helpers to compute transaction reservation for finishing intent items Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 03/12] xfs: rename xfs_inode_can_atomicwrite() -> xfs_inode_can_hw_atomicwrite() John Garry
2025-04-09 2:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09 10:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 04/12] xfs: allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 05/12] xfs: refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 06/12] xfs: refine atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 07/12] xfs: add xfs_atomic_write_cow_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 08/12] xfs: add large atomic writes checks in xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 09/12] xfs: commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 10/12] xfs: add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 11/12] xfs: add xfs_compute_atomic_write_unit_max() John Garry
2025-04-08 21:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 22:47 ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-09 0:41 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-09 5:30 ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-09 8:15 ` John Garry
2025-04-09 22:49 ` Dave Chinner
2025-04-10 8:58 ` John Garry
2025-04-09 23:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-08 10:42 ` [PATCH v6 12/12] xfs: update atomic write limits John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250408232131.GK6307@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=catherine.hoang@oracle.com \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox