From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, tytso@mit.edu, djwong@kernel.org,
john.g.garry@oracle.com, bmarzins@redhat.com,
chaitanyak@nvidia.com, shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com,
yi.zhang@huawei.com, chengzhihao1@huawei.com, yukuai3@huawei.com,
yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -next v3 01/10] block: introduce BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP to queue limits features
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2025 12:31:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250409103148.GA4950@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318073545.3518707-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:35:36PM +0800, Zhang Yi wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
>
> Currently, disks primarily implement the write zeroes command (aka
> REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES) through two mechanisms: the first involves
> physically writing zeros to the disk media (e.g., HDDs), while the
> second performs an unmap operation on the logical blocks, effectively
> putting them into a deallocated state (e.g., SSDs). The first method is
> generally slow, while the second method is typically very fast.
>
> For example, on certain NVMe SSDs that support NVME_NS_DEAC, submitting
> REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES requests with the NVME_WZ_DEAC bit can accelerate
> the write zeros operation by placing disk blocks into
Note that this is a can, not a must. The NVMe definition of Write
Zeroes is unfortunately pretty stupid.
> + [RO] Devices that explicitly support the unmap write zeroes
> + operation in which a single write zeroes request with the unmap
> + bit set to zero out the range of contiguous blocks on storage
> + by freeing blocks, rather than writing physical zeroes to the
> + media.
This is not actually guaranteed for nvme or scsi.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-09 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 7:35 [RFC PATCH -next v3 00/10] fallocate: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES flag Zhang Yi
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 01/10] block: introduce BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP to queue limits features Zhang Yi
2025-04-09 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-04-10 3:52 ` Zhang Yi
2025-04-10 7:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-10 8:20 ` Keith Busch
2025-04-10 9:35 ` Zhang Yi
2025-04-10 9:15 ` Zhang Yi
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 02/10] nvme: set BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP if device supports DEAC bit Zhang Yi
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 03/10] nvme-multipath: add BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP support Zhang Yi
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 04/10] nvmet: set WZDS and DRB if device supports BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP Zhang Yi
2025-04-09 10:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 05/10] scsi: sd: set BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP if device supports unmap zeroing mode Zhang Yi
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 06/10] dm: add BLK_FEAT_WRITE_ZEROES_UNMAP support Zhang Yi
2025-03-19 19:50 ` Benjamin Marzinski
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 07/10] fs: introduce FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES to fallocate Zhang Yi
2025-04-09 10:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-09 10:50 ` Christian Brauner
2025-04-18 6:44 ` Zhang Yi
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 08/10] block: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES support Zhang Yi
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 09/10] block: factor out common part in blkdev_fallocate() Zhang Yi
2025-04-09 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-09 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-18 7:35 ` [RFC PATCH -next v3 10/10] ext4: add FALLOC_FL_WRITE_ZEROES support Zhang Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250409103148.GA4950@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox