From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B31171F30CC; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745314147; cv=none; b=Ief0DVGFLFbmNiZU1485aRJU0NRxfVyId15QvgfmYp4RmYgFvez4SFrPNHi1v/LnLDw+tBTTolDnvVxynd/2X1++0fY7+rHWUNx3vUF54TLifB20yeyBu6dT/r8VY6Ktt2vWIzQtsmHHWpSDi92qXd+3ZX50+Rk+tZ7CIuaG4Ao= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745314147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NEX2z9kU4Vi8WmZ63Y0Gc55AKQh+cgsP9ewt+J6eGSU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nGyr/YGG9VYGLX+4IVhT2oydPDmsawKCaiVCo33/pqv+jPj6OykQYF6lojlwInAFj5WSuvxJHfCxnWsSDTUQCaAp5+PkrHmYWFqPPWu1odoWpW1/MkHLP7/xE2ZeTmu8h04JTS2kVwHZevnjuH0qwLYTgtxY5d73CePPxGhzArE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ArfsoAdS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ArfsoAdS" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2187EC4CEE9; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:29:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745314147; bh=NEX2z9kU4Vi8WmZ63Y0Gc55AKQh+cgsP9ewt+J6eGSU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ArfsoAdSA130xPl3M2aPlw+EBNPJy+wINPcpW7hHDbXqyrounzaoILrNOT1p4GMkq rIgmql3DAJZCXkyIt4suIv69liZ0Ib1sshx9M7yva9OwRT2ccgAmGrmEYf3ionWKnA GU2UbI5MQHVlLxNbkvGBsan4QXHW9KYKraH56jXULTccQq6zjnazgnEj1n5Nuytowt A12H2P4bdXPEB09yowrXVsPHxEXQnLl/WayP0k5YKfgXteWqogMyCpiZAIvYUpouk1 MsXXkkwL1ZaXz6vi45rPu0Tp6VPVk9Q8ZobqHQoqZAc4VsWMd8XX7pI+n0KIHophMc PN727xA+WU/GQ== Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 11:29:02 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: hch Cc: Shinichiro Kawasaki , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "axboe@kernel.dk" , "djwong@kernel.org" , "ebiggers@google.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: move the bdex_statx call to vfs_getattr_nosec Message-ID: <20250422-gehofft-erdwall-a387c8909e42@brauner> References: <20250417064042.712140-1-hch@lst.de> <20250422055149.GB29356@lst.de> <20250422-angepackt-reisen-bc24fbec2702@brauner> <20250422081736.GA674@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250422081736.GA674@lst.de> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:17:36AM +0200, hch wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:15:48AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > > - bdev = blkdev_get_no_open(backing_inode->i_rdev); > > > + if (!(request_mask & (STATX_DIOALIGN | STATX_WRITE_ATOMIC))) > > > + return; > > > > This leaks the block device reference if blkdev_get_no_open() succeeds. > > > > > + > > > + bdev = blkdev_get_no_open(d_backing_inode(path->dentry)->i_rdev); > > The one removed by the patch above, or the one added after the check > below? :) Ah, I got confused by the inline diff.