From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: miklos@szeredi.hu
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm,
jlayton@kernel.org, jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com,
josef@toxicpanda.com, willy@infradead.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/11] fuse: support large folios
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 15:58:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250512225840.826249-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)
This patchset adds support for large folios in fuse.
This does not yet switch fuse to using large folios. Using large folios in
fuse is dependent on adding granular dirty-page tracking. This will be done
in a separate patchset that will have fuse use iomap [1]. There also needs
to be a followup (also part of future work) for having dirty page balancing
not tank performance for unprivileged servers where bdi limits lead to subpar
throttling [1], before enabling large folios for fuse.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAJnrk1a38pv3OgFZRfdTiDMXuPWuBgN8KY47XfOsYHj=N2wxAg@mail.gmail.com/#t
Changelog:
v5:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250426000828.3216220-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v5 -> v6:
* Add Bernd's reviewed-bys
* Iniitalize err to 0 for refactoring fuse_fill_write_pages()
(Dan and syzbot)
* Add comment for readahead about size of large folio (Bernd)
* Use WARN_ON for readahead size sanity-checking
v4:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20250123012448.2479372-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v4 -> v5:
* Now that temp pages are removed in FUSE, resubmit v3.
v3:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20241213221818.322371-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v3 -> v4:
* Add Jeff's reviewed-bys
* Drop writeback large folios changes, drop turning large folios on. These
will be part of a separate future patchset
v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20241125220537.3663725-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v2 -> v3:
* Fix direct io parsing to check each extracted page instead of assuming all
pages in a large folio will be used (Matthew)
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20241109001258.2216604-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com/
v1 -> v2:
* Change naming from "non-writeback write" to "writethrough write"
* Fix deadlock for writethrough writes by calling fault_in_iov_iter_readable()
* first
before __filemap_get_folio() (Josef)
* For readahead, retain original folio_size() for descs.length (Josef)
* Use folio_zero_range() api in fuse_copy_folio() (Josef)
* Add Josef's reviewed-bys
Joanne Koong (11):
fuse: support copying large folios
fuse: support large folios for retrieves
fuse: refactor fuse_fill_write_pages()
fuse: support large folios for writethrough writes
fuse: support large folios for folio reads
fuse: support large folios for symlinks
fuse: support large folios for stores
fuse: support large folios for queued writes
fuse: support large folios for readahead
fuse: optimize direct io large folios processing
fuse: support large folios for writeback
fs/fuse/dev.c | 126 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
fs/fuse/dir.c | 8 +--
fs/fuse/file.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
fs/fuse/fuse_dev_i.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-12 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 22:58 Joanne Koong [this message]
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] fuse: support copying large folios Joanne Koong
2025-05-14 0:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-05-14 22:59 ` Joanne Koong
2025-05-15 2:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-05-15 18:50 ` Joanne Koong
2025-05-15 8:26 ` Miklos Szeredi
2025-05-15 17:53 ` Joanne Koong
2025-05-16 9:47 ` Miklos Szeredi
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] fuse: support large folios for retrieves Joanne Koong
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] fuse: refactor fuse_fill_write_pages() Joanne Koong
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] fuse: support large folios for writethrough writes Joanne Koong
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] fuse: support large folios for folio reads Joanne Koong
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] fuse: support large folios for symlinks Joanne Koong
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] fuse: support large folios for stores Joanne Koong
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] fuse: support large folios for queued writes Joanne Koong
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] fuse: support large folios for readahead Joanne Koong
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] fuse: optimize direct io large folios processing Joanne Koong
2025-05-13 7:19 ` Miklos Szeredi
2025-05-13 20:39 ` Joanne Koong
2025-05-15 8:27 ` Miklos Szeredi
2025-05-12 22:58 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] fuse: support large folios for writeback Joanne Koong
2025-05-13 7:32 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] fuse: support large folios Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250512225840.826249-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=bernd.schubert@fastmail.fm \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).