From: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
To: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org,
mattbobrowski@google.com, amir73il@gmail.com, repnop@google.com,
jlayton@kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, gnoack@google.com,
m@maowtm.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] namei: Introduce new helper function path_walk_parent()
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:42:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250611.Bee1Iohoh4We@digikod.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPhsuW6oet8_LbL+6mVi7Lc4U_8i7O-PN5F1zOm5esV52sBu0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 05:56:01PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion! It does look like a good solution.
>
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 4:34 PM NeilBrown <neil@brown.name> wrote:
>
> > The above looks a lot like follow_dotdot(). This is good because it
> > means that it is likely correct. But it is bad because it means there
> > are two copies of essentially the same code - making maintenance harder.
> >
> > I think it would be good to split the part that you want out of
> > follow_dotdot() and use that. Something like the following.
> >
> > You might need a small wrapper in landlock which would, for example,
> > pass LOOKUP_BENEATH and replace path->dentry with the parent on success.
> >
> > NeilBrown
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> > index 4bb889fc980b..b81d07b4417b 100644
> > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -2048,36 +2048,65 @@ static struct dentry *follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
> > return nd->path.dentry;
> > }
> >
> > -static struct dentry *follow_dotdot(struct nameidata *nd)
> > +/**
> > + * path_walk_parent - Find the parent of the given struct path
> > + * @path - The struct path to start from
> > + * @root - A struct path which serves as a boundary not to be crosses
> > + * @flags - Some LOOKUP_ flags
> > + *
> > + * Find and return the dentry for the parent of the given path (mount/dentry).
> > + * If the given path is the root of a mounted tree, it is first updated to
> > + * the mount point on which that tree is mounted.
> > + *
> > + * If %LOOKUP_NO_XDEV is given, then *after* the path is updated to a new mount,
> > + * the error EXDEV is returned.
> > + * If no parent can be found, either because the tree is not mounted or because
> > + * the @path matches the @root, then @path->dentry is returned unless @flags
> > + * contains %LOOKUP_BENEATH, in which case -EXDEV is returned.
> > + *
> > + * Returns: either an ERR_PTR() or the chosen parent which will have had the
> > + * refcount incremented.
> > + */
> > +struct dentry *path_walk_parent(struct path *path, struct path *root, int flags)
>
> We can probably call this __path_walk_parent() and make it static.
>
> Then we can add an exported path_walk_parent() that calls
> __path_walk_parent() and adds extra logic.
>
> If this looks good to folks, I can draft v4 based on this idea.
This looks good but it would be better if we could also do a full path
walk within RCU when possible.
>
> Thanks,
> Song
>
> [...]
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-06 21:30 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/5] bpf path iterator Song Liu
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] namei: Introduce new helper function path_walk_parent() Song Liu
2025-06-10 17:18 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-06-10 17:26 ` Song Liu
2025-06-10 22:26 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-10 22:34 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-10 23:08 ` Song Liu
2025-06-11 0:23 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-10 23:34 ` NeilBrown
2025-06-11 0:56 ` Song Liu
2025-06-11 15:42 ` Mickaël Salaün [this message]
2025-06-11 16:31 ` Song Liu
2025-06-11 17:50 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-11 18:08 ` Song Liu
2025-06-12 9:01 ` Jan Kara
2025-06-12 9:49 ` Jan Kara
2025-06-12 12:31 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-16 0:24 ` Ref-less parent walk from Landlock (was: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/5] namei: Introduce new helper function path_walk_parent()) Tingmao Wang
2025-06-17 6:20 ` Song Liu
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/5] landlock: Use path_walk_parent() Song Liu
2025-06-08 18:45 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Introduce path iterator Song Liu
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf " Song Liu
2025-06-06 21:30 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Path walk test Song Liu
2025-06-08 17:32 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/5] bpf path iterator Tingmao Wang
2025-06-09 6:23 ` Song Liu
2025-06-09 8:08 ` Tingmao Wang
2025-06-11 11:36 ` Christian Brauner
2025-06-11 15:39 ` Mickaël Salaün
2025-06-08 17:32 ` Tingmao Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250611.Bee1Iohoh4We@digikod.net \
--to=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m@maowtm.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=repnop@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).