From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEA5C28F926; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 22:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750198505; cv=none; b=esnUYZO67VBPNQlXGfiClZh+wis6i/qNjO7Wko8QePa2qNwGdFviSlb2T+n5ZcuyT9JzG6Vowsdyfd0ZS8sRqJYUc/+z+b+eYzrzfbZgWUjI7XrW7O08gBOkN+QIv7BmhUanvbT4g7G4LEkn/+H5ANBr/3CkJO1WY3THyZHieAs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750198505; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XUeH8KN8qsKbup97BWz233wrrzmBDES39fvFo9jL/2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DMN3svmjddeZp19rSbxc/Y4WHoGoIwRE0xVYKn8cjD1PPCzl0Gd0G0WJmN1nmouuc3ZfrJtEcOSfv0Tdd5mfj43LTgW4xPL0s+JVUfKlEdNO+TvMj6wIYjvtERitDJ4ZvSbFj3YgIK0EsMxumA7LEeBzrWF/qHt+6qt6FyIrO9w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=ozdWYcD3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="ozdWYcD3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=GJWhkI7curRveMQOPZr/qbrbPARld8RKxs6RGq/nqCc=; b=ozdWYcD3S0IBMZf0xkj6HaM9hp wXnPxi/KYoVU026phspsqK9EFVjGm0Z6DNESlInqCdERPbJdefvwyy10IJ9S8wMl0VOeSrqHIG+hS jVU00sao151le8IoJ5g7+abb8DlmwcEvtJG7gC+U9YvLesC+H9thG1Pj65ymhcNb1tVmorsU048Jt hZaf3zRhoX+95inuodNknNg8fBuRvMOvxAQ3A6DUtKczJp2iUiPBxz/E8n6LJ6HBqoPxkPCXk8QCQ 10g+qytuTKuh9gjd8Dc91b3IXp1GyjoAb6KAyrasW6BTzCzy/lPWdx42vW9DCWZgf1ZINkbN2EtLE Z2yPmvdQ==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uRea6-00000001Yeq-0pxd; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 22:15:02 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 23:15:02 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Viacheslav Dubeyko Cc: "idryomov@gmail.com" , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ceph: fix a race with rename() in ceph_mdsc_build_path() Message-ID: <20250617221502.GN1880847@ZenIV> References: <20250614062051.GC1880847@ZenIV> <20250614062257.535594-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> <20250614062257.535594-3-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> <20250617220122.GM1880847@ZenIV> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:12:08PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > On Tue, 2025-06-17 at 23:01 +0100, Al Viro wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 06:21:38PM +0000, Viacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > > > > Tested-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko > > > Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko > > > > OK, tested-by/reviewed-by applied to commits in that branch, branch > > force-pushed to the same place > > (git.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git work.ceph-d_name-fixes) > > > > Would you prefer to merge it via the ceph tree? Or I could throw it > > into my #for-next and push it to Linus come the next window - up to you... > > Frankly speaking, your tree could be the faster way to upstream. However, I can > push this patch set into the ceph tree for more deeper testing in the internal > testing infrastructure. But I don't expect any serious issues in the patches > that could introduce some bugs. > > Ilya, > > What is your opinion on this? Would you prefer to go through the ceph tree? I can send a pull request to you now just as easily as I could send it to Linus a month and a half down the road... ;-) Up to you, guys.