From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B8F62AEE4 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750704944; cv=none; b=FmNZyYhSd2EW8rauLmynapV7XfoqalCS2tfUTFIvtbkmsS2M0U9E07iKAr1CfrrKKikpIqgMDSBcW6QoJS9E4aeLz6rudUhNmaUttvY/ws/IkmRatL1DNvz/yjp2LkcPj8hgd1IKytSBKoDipuhNCz+KK4pNqXqbyhnOJyQ9RNI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750704944; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iGznlE0Zp1RRmUqCa2W2cOV9bqFJcBAn9HLTK++OBDE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qVjfRUKY5ygXIYH/WWzeENnRaX+y56ZgP65GBZOf2KpEM2rXJfqi8veejnJgI5yXObstdmw/2VYTIwN25+jSoBUqoblTP2mPwzax7yeDExxWbTYVrMUleKkvT+iZgbUU1zyVqOTwlBbFKxn5mETCaXAyMC2zm1TotVdLq4OEF4Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=rGfem81d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="rGfem81d" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=RuSZSqmFKJmYDQU5lR3Ublh4mC0RO55gAwVCy4R5gLY=; b=rGfem81dCCz2H0fQRO0gSDI8Nq W8nif/AzZlebhAi0evcyfGJQtKc782vKo/ymWFhzEtqscOEzOPcF/Mb440BZt035+m1nZtB/L6nvX w3jnVugtj7I/966rQ/UEmeOybP1jv5vvv5slK1JYmHuFetPTsr4s7N/3Bqo9EB4yq7yp1wsV4Ssl7 ReXJrzMSGjo06UYRaxrKP2nQZEqZ+V1ILSkD+WKUFZ85Po95n64zmQ/2acBfdV/uW/fR4uvvaJrUa RsjblpZ/aCh5dXhnrj/7HkeucFqq1TtppyR9pUk5xWFxpQwBk87uQKhWhxlKctO/ggnrYW4YBGLEl wh/yj4Gw==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uTmKS-0000000GJPf-0Opq; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:55:40 +0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:55:40 +0100 From: Al Viro To: Ian Kent Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Linus Torvalds , Eric Biederman Subject: Re: [PATCHES v2][RFC][CFR] mount-related stuff Message-ID: <20250623185540.GH1880847@ZenIV> References: <20250610081758.GE299672@ZenIV> <20250623044912.GA1248894@ZenIV> <93a5388a-3063-4aa2-8e77-6691c80d9974@themaw.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93a5388a-3063-4aa2-8e77-6691c80d9974@themaw.net> Sender: Al Viro On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 05:06:52PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > I also have revived my patch to make may_umount_tree() namespace aware > > and it still seems to work fine. Could you post it?