From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: alexjlzheng@gmail.com
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with locks
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 11:47:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250701184737.GA9991@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250701144847.12752-1-alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
On Tue, Jul 01, 2025 at 10:48:47PM +0800, alexjlzheng@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
>
> In the buffer write path, iomap_set_range_uptodate() is called every
> time iomap_end_write() is called. But if folio_test_uptodate() holds, we
> know that all blocks in this folio are already in the uptodate state, so
> there is no need to go deep into the critical section of state_lock to
> execute bitmap_set().
>
> Although state_lock may not have significant lock contention due to
> folio lock, this patch at least reduces the number of instructions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
> ---
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 3729391a18f3..fb4519158f3a 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -71,6 +71,9 @@ static void iomap_set_range_uptodate(struct folio *folio, size_t off,
> unsigned long flags;
> bool uptodate = true;
>
> + if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
> + return;
Looks fine, but how exhaustively have you tested this with heavy IO
workloads? I /think/ it's the case that folios always creep towards
ifs_is_fully_uptodate() == true state and once they've gotten there
never go back. But folio state bugs are tricky to detect once they've
crept in.
--D
> +
> if (ifs) {
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ifs->state_lock, flags);
> uptodate = ifs_set_range_uptodate(folio, ifs, off, len);
> --
> 2.49.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-01 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 14:48 [PATCH] iomap: avoid unnecessary ifs_set_range_uptodate() with locks alexjlzheng
2025-07-01 18:47 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-02 12:09 ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-02 18:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-03 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 14:33 ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-03 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 17:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-07-07 4:08 ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-09 3:30 ` Jinliang Zheng
2025-07-11 7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250701184737.GA9991@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=alexjlzheng@gmail.com \
--cc=alexjlzheng@tencent.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).