linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, hch@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] iomap: remove old partial eof zeroing optimization
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 22:34:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715053417.GR2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714204122.349582-7-bfoster@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 04:41:21PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> iomap_zero_range() optimizes the partial eof block zeroing use case
> by force zeroing if the mapping is dirty. This is to avoid frequent
> flushing on file extending workloads, which hurts performance.
> 
> Now that the folio batch mechanism provides a more generic solution
> and is used by the only real zero range user (XFS), this isolated
> optimization is no longer needed. Remove the unnecessary code and
> let callers use the folio batch or fall back to flushing by default.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Heh, I was staring at this last Friday chasing fuse+iomap bugs in
fallocate zerorange and straining to remember what this does.
Is this chunk still needed if the ->iomap_begin implementation doesn't
(or forgets to) grab the folio batch for iomap?

My bug turned out to be a bug in my fuse+iomap design -- with the way
iomap_zero_range does things, you have to flush+unmap, punch the range
and zero the range.  If you punch and realloc the range and *then* try
to zero the range, the new unwritten extents cause iomap to miss dirty
pages that fuse should've unmapped.  Ooops.

--D

> ---
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 24 ------------------------
>  1 file changed, 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index 194e3cc0857f..d2bbed692c06 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -1484,33 +1484,9 @@ iomap_zero_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t len, bool *did_zero,
>  		.private	= private,
>  	};
>  	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> -	unsigned int blocksize = i_blocksize(inode);
> -	unsigned int off = pos & (blocksize - 1);
> -	loff_t plen = min_t(loff_t, len, blocksize - off);
>  	int ret;
>  	bool range_dirty;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Zero range can skip mappings that are zero on disk so long as
> -	 * pagecache is clean. If pagecache was dirty prior to zero range, the
> -	 * mapping converts on writeback completion and so must be zeroed.
> -	 *
> -	 * The simplest way to deal with this across a range is to flush
> -	 * pagecache and process the updated mappings. To avoid excessive
> -	 * flushing on partial eof zeroing, special case it to zero the
> -	 * unaligned start portion if already dirty in pagecache.
> -	 */
> -	if (!iter.fbatch && off &&
> -	    filemap_range_needs_writeback(mapping, pos, pos + plen - 1)) {
> -		iter.len = plen;
> -		while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0)
> -			iter.status = iomap_zero_iter(&iter, did_zero);
> -
> -		iter.len = len - (iter.pos - pos);
> -		if (ret || !iter.len)
> -			return ret;
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * To avoid an unconditional flush, check pagecache state and only flush
>  	 * if dirty and the fs returns a mapping that might convert on
> -- 
> 2.50.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-15  5:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-14 20:41 [PATCH v3 0/7] iomap: zero range folio batch support Brian Foster
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] filemap: add helper to look up dirty folios in a range Brian Foster
2025-07-15  5:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] iomap: remove pos+len BUG_ON() to after folio lookup Brian Foster
2025-07-15  5:14   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing Brian Foster
2025-07-15  5:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:35     ` Brian Foster
2025-07-18 11:30     ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-18 13:48       ` Brian Foster
2025-07-19 11:07         ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-21  8:47           ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-28 12:57             ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-30 13:19               ` Brian Foster
2025-08-02  7:26                 ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-30 13:17           ` Brian Foster
2025-08-02  7:19             ` Zhang Yi
2025-08-05 13:08               ` Brian Foster
2025-08-06  3:10                 ` Zhang Yi
2025-08-06 13:25                   ` Brian Foster
2025-08-07  4:58                     ` Zhang Yi
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] xfs: always trim mapping to requested range for zero range Brian Foster
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings Brian Foster
2025-07-15  5:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:35     ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:19       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] iomap: remove old partial eof zeroing optimization Brian Foster
2025-07-15  5:34   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-07-15 12:36     ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 16:20         ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 16:30           ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-14 20:41 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] xfs: error tag to force zeroing on debug kernels Brian Foster
2025-07-15  5:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 12:39     ` Brian Foster
2025-07-15 14:30       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 16:20         ` Brian Foster

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250715053417.GR2672049@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).