From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 129731C5D53 for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752864007; cv=none; b=NcY4x3dJbWUD+IEPsa2GwGgjBxGbKNsjVv19T1uXUdoRrkRsujghiubT2kKFZi5ivCUOSmA2x67+dl6u+VXyS9eh3Y/eGR9xN1FDx/Sstx5/RIEUfpmYewmHvxxHhl7GYr/pQqDFmn2yV2qgg/AuInU/Y/3cGvEMcqUrIW+y+lY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752864007; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Hv1xU7JtH9S/kkaIAU/OaiF6ycCKTwbiV+8uwui9vJo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gPnx/G41QGeHNp9UuWnA4W0hjopHydHfgFLxyPtkniTiw3yk1fV4BiMbwMiVwzF37j6tWYSMRX/cMtrvNjGkpm6kF6e8ZaqiybnshvHQDcTnh6CVluOUjdYcrVScJ3gbonYB43JHv2oBHgHgbasqfsq2RTaQK/Y1zA+3Jm0sNfo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Bwc6RvGA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Bwc6RvGA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84665C4CEEB; Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:40:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752864006; bh=Hv1xU7JtH9S/kkaIAU/OaiF6ycCKTwbiV+8uwui9vJo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Bwc6RvGAPXlucQ1u+E/5ZGca8jjQM1hs7JMfCPhoEVGnwgO9Hfe43CSKgo5HPwTdM ExpudZ0NEfkZgRZ6IOXrA/qLswo18jUO8bt262hH2Fw67WBicbPw6O3WfPvn2/PuNO 34gJbrCQnqtEITOP1Frna8oN2VP/UP4eqIIIG5tdJ2IiLdwtmq7DQRRu2kWS5b0xPt UUDF5p/yW9haByLz/4WmZ/nIt2galPf8EZPuDuideNS0zDL01i99LyAydXzWtIIHPL Rm2LfCOYjwTwMH2VWSKQMiCnkbjTIMOfdbQbyi8qqlM3/qugkELFM+dNy7F+LkLaJ+ tNEFUfe70Ug2Q== Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 11:40:06 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: Bernd Schubert Cc: Bernd Schubert , "John@groves.net" , "joannelkoong@gmail.com" , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , "neal@gompa.dev" , "miklos@szeredi.hu" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] libfuse: enable iomap cache management Message-ID: <20250718184006.GZ2672029@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <175279460162.714730.17358082513177016895.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <175279460180.714730.8674508220056498050.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <573af180-296d-4d75-a43d-eb0825ed9af8@ddn.com> <20250718182213.GX2672029@frogsfrogsfrogs> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 08:35:29PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote: > > > On 7/18/25 20:22, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 04:16:28PM +0000, Bernd Schubert wrote: > >> On 7/18/25 01:38, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > >>> From: Darrick J. Wong > >>> > >>> Add the library methods so that fuse servers can manage an in-kernel > >>> iomap cache. This enables better performance on small IOs and is > >>> required if the filesystem needs synchronization between pagecache > >>> writes and writeback. > >> > >> Sorry, if this ready to be merged? I don't see in linux master? Or part > >> of your other patches (will take some to go through these). > > > > No, everything you see in here is all RFC status and not for merging. > > We're past -rc6, it's far too late to be trying to get anything new > > merged in the kernel. > > > > Though I say that as a former iomap maintainer who wouldn't take big > > core code changes after -rc4 or XFS changes after -rc6. I think I was > > much more conservative about that than most maintainers. :) > > > > (The cover letter yells very loudly about do not merge any of this, > > btw.) > > > This is [PATCH 1/1] and when I wrote the mail it was not sorted in > threaded form - I didn't see a cover letter for this specific patch. > Might also be because some mails go to my ddn address and some to > my own one. I use the DDN address for patches to give DDN credits > for the work, but fastmail provides so much better filtering - I > prefer my private address for CCs. > > So asked because I was confused about this [1/1] - it made it look > like it is ready. Ah, yeah. My stgit maintainer^Wwrapper scripts only know how to put the RFC tag on the cover letter, not the patches themselves. Would you prefer that I send to your bsbernd.com domain from now on so the emails all end up in the same place? --D > Thanks, > Bernd >