From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, hch@infradead.org,
djwong@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/7] iomap: remove pos+len BUG_ON() to after folio lookup
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 10:47:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250807144711.564137-3-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250807144711.564137-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
The bug checks at the top of iomap_write_begin() assume the pos/len
reflect exactly the next range to process. This may no longer be the
case once the get folio path is able to process a folio batch from
the filesystem. On top of that, len is already trimmed to within the
iomap/srcmap by iomap_length(), so these checks aren't terribly
useful. Remove the unnecessary BUG_ON() checks.
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
---
fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index fd827398afd2..01721f10cf6e 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -812,15 +812,12 @@ static int iomap_write_begin(struct iomap_iter *iter,
size_t *poffset, u64 *plen)
{
const struct iomap *srcmap = iomap_iter_srcmap(iter);
- loff_t pos = iter->pos;
+ loff_t pos;
u64 len = min_t(u64, SIZE_MAX, iomap_length(iter));
struct folio *folio;
int status = 0;
len = min_not_zero(len, *plen);
- BUG_ON(pos + len > iter->iomap.offset + iter->iomap.length);
- if (srcmap != &iter->iomap)
- BUG_ON(pos + len > srcmap->offset + srcmap->length);
if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
return -EINTR;
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-07 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-07 14:47 [PATCH v4 0/7] iomap: zero range folio batch support Brian Foster
2025-08-07 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] filemap: add helper to look up dirty folios in a range Brian Foster
2025-08-07 14:47 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-08-07 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing Brian Foster
2025-08-07 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] xfs: always trim mapping to requested range for zero range Brian Foster
2025-08-07 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] xfs: fill dirty folios on zero range of unwritten mappings Brian Foster
2025-08-07 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] iomap: remove old partial eof zeroing optimization Brian Foster
2025-08-07 14:47 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] xfs: error tag to force zeroing on debug kernels Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250807144711.564137-3-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).