From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 13/13] fsverity: check IS_VERITY() in fsverity_cleanup_inode()
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2025 00:57:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250810075706.172910-14-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250810075706.172910-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
Since getting the address of the fsverity_info has gotten a bit more
expensive, make fsverity_cleanup_inode() check for IS_VERITY() instead.
This avoids adding more overhead to non-verity files.
This assumes that verity info is never set when !IS_VERITY(), which is
currently true, but add a VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE() that asserts that. (This
of course defeats the optimization, but only when CONFIG_VFS_DEBUG=y.)
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/fsverity.h | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/fsverity.h b/include/linux/fsverity.h
index 844f7b8b56bbc..5bc7280425a71 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsverity.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsverity.h
@@ -188,12 +188,19 @@ void __fsverity_cleanup_inode(struct inode *inode);
*
* Filesystems must call this on inode eviction to free the inode's verity info.
*/
static inline void fsverity_cleanup_inode(struct inode *inode)
{
- if (*fsverity_info_addr(inode))
+ /*
+ * Only IS_VERITY() inodes can have verity info, so start by checking
+ * for IS_VERITY() (which is faster than retrieving the pointer to the
+ * verity info). This minimizes overhead for non-verity inodes.
+ */
+ if (IS_VERITY(inode))
__fsverity_cleanup_inode(inode);
+ else
+ VFS_WARN_ON_ONCE(*fsverity_info_addr(inode) != NULL);
}
/* read_metadata.c */
int fsverity_ioctl_read_metadata(struct file *filp, const void __user *uarg);
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-10 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-10 7:56 [PATCH v5 00/13] Move fscrypt and fsverity info out of struct inode Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:56 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] fscrypt: replace raw loads of info pointer with helper function Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:56 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] fscrypt: add support for info in fs-specific part of inode Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:56 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] ext4: move crypt info pointer to " Eric Biggers
2025-08-11 11:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-08-10 7:56 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] f2fs: " Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:56 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] ubifs: " Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:56 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] ceph: " Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] fs: remove inode::i_crypt_info Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] fsverity: add support for info in fs-specific part of inode Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] ext4: move verity info pointer to " Eric Biggers
2025-08-11 11:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-08-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] f2fs: " Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] btrfs: " Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] fs: remove inode::i_verity_info Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 7:57 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-08-10 8:47 ` [PATCH v5 00/13] Move fscrypt and fsverity info out of struct inode Christian Brauner
2025-08-10 9:03 ` Eric Biggers
2025-08-11 13:17 ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-11 13:34 ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-11 16:39 ` Eric Biggers
2025-08-15 14:28 ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-10 14:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-10 17:03 ` Eric Biggers
2025-08-10 17:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-11 13:35 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250810075706.172910-14-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).