From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E898F22D4C3; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 07:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755330295; cv=none; b=m7VgHeGJE86muyLGo2T7KoTbrq+i82w+xsEGp4ObaQoU/dBSMznkjNud6egHttIrySuDgmKqTAa3qerDm/Ipo7O/UfL/VLwejP9kNsypsKcQsQGmspKzftoBDuZ3z/wgtVLgz3g/qEmwerFQpLawCB2QijwNI1JY2OlME119uCo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755330295; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FDTVrovJiNTKEaABlXLg4LIyv1BzW1WJIThardotLaA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cEjYpGFVTJxk793JvFN0Sy+6+o2fdhMCjV/f5szZaRPGX+Ww53EMk45ilpm4EwBLHuqVtYOVp2Es/gjH6ia9rZ202clncFnPZQdxgJKIXbXeuBfNfaqWM2hT6T6RUBUJzQ5+OqCFysFaQX3412JfhowZCA72tzxj1zH+YQ9bvLA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=S3IiG5ii; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="S3IiG5ii" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1755330292; x=1786866292; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=FDTVrovJiNTKEaABlXLg4LIyv1BzW1WJIThardotLaA=; b=S3IiG5iiShUpHP1FemnKH6NQbWdMxQOEenBt8ttPhE5AVsIDedC+2m3/ RXiNQOJpStBE2Q4yni7gojjj5kKG8HR5WjRIa5UxjMXw3ouxdnXxVKNmP 0WMLTDNhRN3/+BbHNY6+SoxuwjVjwL/SY7q5+ro8Ob23TN804umn9CAUD zlDeCUPiMW1bH91UaFSwacBec9RPatgC+MR/S1dJu1MJ+Ww/reFr32VMj zFUXpj6GrkSMmVgQ5UFXZOy6qHz6Y/jUvwlgBBwtvvmOB8+dP/RHSxsQx xZ0cpTiNvuir9t0tjHK7bAyRpF5VMGavs1OoBJ8zo7sk/8X2Oxi16Q5H3 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: shjyrv9aRym9W1X2db4+iw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zdtiI+aXSs+o7//gG28Ekg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11523"; a="61270501" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,293,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="61270501" Received: from orviesa005.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.145]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Aug 2025 00:44:51 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xd+UO464SjyvQM+D85GEKg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HEW+kR6mRFmysny/LchRpQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,293,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="172512746" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 4ea60e6ab079) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Aug 2025 00:44:46 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 4ea60e6ab079 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1unBaf-000CgW-09; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 07:44:37 +0000 Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 15:43:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Thomas Bertschinger , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Bertschinger Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_NAME_TO_HANDLE_AT Message-ID: <202508161506.L391RGhx-lkp@intel.com> References: <20250814235431.995876-3-tahbertschinger@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250814235431.995876-3-tahbertschinger@gmail.com> Hi Thomas, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on brauner-vfs/vfs.all] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.17-rc1 next-20250815] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Thomas-Bertschinger/fhandle-create-helper-for-name_to_handle_at-2/20250815-075417 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.all patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250814235431.995876-3-tahbertschinger%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/6] io_uring: add support for IORING_OP_NAME_TO_HANDLE_AT config: parisc-randconfig-r132-20250816 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250816/202508161506.L391RGhx-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.5.0 reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250816/202508161506.L391RGhx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202508161506.L391RGhx-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): hppa-linux-ld: io_uring/openclose.o: in function `io_name_to_handle_at': >> io_uring/openclose.c:221:(.text+0x838): undefined reference to `do_name_to_handle_at' vim +221 io_uring/openclose.c 211 212 int io_name_to_handle_at(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags) 213 { 214 struct io_name_to_handle *nh = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_name_to_handle); 215 int lookup_flags = 0; 216 long ret; 217 218 if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK) 219 lookup_flags = LOOKUP_CACHED; 220 > 221 ret = do_name_to_handle_at(nh->dfd, nh->path, nh->ufh, nh->mount_id, 222 nh->open_flag, lookup_flags); 223 224 if (ret == -EAGAIN && (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_NONBLOCK)) 225 return -EAGAIN; 226 227 if (ret < 0) 228 req_set_fail(req); 229 io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0); 230 return IOU_COMPLETE; 231 } 232 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki