From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Do we need an opt-in for file systems use of hw atomic writes?
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 16:45:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250819144545.GA18364@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250819144347.GC7942@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 07:43:47AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> What is the likelihood of convincing the nvme standards folks to add a
> new command for write-untorn that doesn't just silently fail if you get
> the parameters wrong?
In my experience that depends mostly on how much a big customers for
NVMe hardware is asking for it. Hint: while Oracle isn't in the
absolute top tier of the influence scale it probably is just below.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 13:17 Do we need an opt-in for file systems use of hw atomic writes? Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-14 13:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-14 13:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-14 16:04 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-15 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 3:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-15 6:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 12:45 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-14 13:39 ` John Garry
2025-07-14 13:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-14 15:53 ` John Garry
2025-07-15 6:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 8:42 ` John Garry
2025-07-15 9:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-19 11:42 ` John Garry
2025-08-19 13:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-19 14:36 ` John Garry
2025-08-19 14:43 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-08-19 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-08-21 14:01 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-15 10:02 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-15 11:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 12:20 ` Christian Brauner
2025-07-15 11:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-07-14 20:53 ` Dave Chinner
2025-07-15 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-15 20:56 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-16 5:50 ` Nilay Shroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250819144545.GA18364@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).