From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 443A91D54E2 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756126976; cv=none; b=HmbWDbJsOZdKWNHkkqInkTs1Xbt7EHGVM8RgKSNnDFh5HcDdlEPWpO3Qq7XsXmgx+FNoeD/lv37XP9xvp1lGEDrxND0WHzDxtDLDai2d/zKWG3/gXmqUEuRuP3CDEFVvQGkcLiqC/Jxc6MlJV16ICsX6uzqgmZjokWs6qDyF2FE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756126976; c=relaxed/simple; bh=L7a0h4R7riDVbyLCur8w1vUYhfmxec+e9tlHwPgbnbA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=W+yzjkbMCOZsmFV9UuT26rUIFedjWDF9l+CeqWxCLzLbKTukFeD0mvFSScBDco+Hm2ICjTuvRxOIffaVRa6QK7l3KV/+CfHJo1a80I17UG28shVzUKQK2WT4m1K8yZ8/yiNjOEDvjxPe3B4MgE2nlV5uImV6fWJr7AZjXlYh1pA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=D54UhFYV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="D54UhFYV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9064FC4CEED; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:02:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756126975; bh=L7a0h4R7riDVbyLCur8w1vUYhfmxec+e9tlHwPgbnbA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=D54UhFYVH4ZP2o0H32KK3Ekw/IpebTy3eGbfliforlWSJXZQ//kHVkU4klQOfPxjJ 6PBeI1ZublZVSRm7eFYLO1n4uG3wG2pUvuAEwDICAUGN1WbIZqA38hL6jT9WJgM954 3Wh2qijjqDM6axHI4YQe1xf91rRukwD2yjXcwCv6hnhwkgBRsmCdil7m9Zuza3+Hjj UngXwLSICnFrMC1r2jZER3h9kuNCxEhRc98g5IcxAPlMQ5uQJhy7nya8JXD1YOh7gm +DbtrfqbH0mMqoQlGL2/60Z5rh3vlMOfKaT95xvELnneHFoaPJJPY+z4YWQya1vDtp R1KVbBcld0WCw== Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 15:02:52 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Al Viro Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/52] do_loopback(): use __free(path_put) to deal with old_path Message-ID: <20250825-vernommen-fledermaus-3917c2718ad2@brauner> References: <20250825044046.GI39973@ZenIV> <20250825044355.1541941-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> <20250825044355.1541941-22-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250825044355.1541941-22-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 05:43:25AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > preparations for making unlock_mount() a __cleanup(); > can't have path_put() inside mount_lock scope. > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro > --- Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner