From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4FDE23F40C for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 09:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756460929; cv=none; b=KO/QkMOAY9zgXPQ2jwYwLv6wInGXFxlPh6TwIRE25nnhxKEg93bvbRvzeIdk22FYPtE5qaQO5lFZMhjFpGFD27Estuzp8hHbantLSlM/5dOMGNZQASTrsFwZJtGPnYZZlfuZFNLpfD8wVjqZd5NJStVoitynoOKgSp2zMoFwx34= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756460929; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PNl20q3w0790Jp1Llmkfye2N8RUUCIO1nwyDAhMuUWI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=f+Hh9XpTxBIDiIDtqr6r4sl8bAy+wkV7JnwpUM4RWKwGlNgxJZFkJVNvRN2sRv2WZgpAJLnHRwRMQoNejWWMGcYbgsROmP0IKD94VRWs8zvGmal5S2Ff9NPQuSI//hATCZXMk2UD7idOFTy8+FMB8VAU2eEw7+hoAXWqj1GSBXY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=VM2rYt4k; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="VM2rYt4k" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E113C4CEF0; Fri, 29 Aug 2025 09:48:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756460928; bh=PNl20q3w0790Jp1Llmkfye2N8RUUCIO1nwyDAhMuUWI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VM2rYt4klU4PqWHBnMNAkK0RSvwqRuKB8Moc4Cy+4vtUdo0aMzrRyKUyKm6SXeYlH SAuawGM9wy4xC62hDi4Fq+JQ3n2khGIdI1EW2lwYWbSfmO59hcSBHOfEi6+AnoQK8a 6jC+qvJYVe8pyAW3c79RMUzUXcpjQWrj5K2K9DshmID4+75AVwEEfa+Kk7fH2+vhMb mTdJt54EcuYOIrQc4mrpdTxoaWuLVs/RjntwtgwhmKkGiENK9YGOl7wCmFQRFJ62ap 5QIEKeCnqVXnliKTWXzvTw72Y5QWtUsR4fygqVwMg8EpGFebtsEG4cZL9t+3No2Gjp R9g2gh6COZMhA== Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 11:48:45 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Al Viro Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/63] __detach_mounts(): use guards Message-ID: <20250829-hemmung-hinzog-d97f61032db0@brauner> References: <20250828230706.GA3340273@ZenIV> <20250828230806.3582485-1-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> <20250828230806.3582485-4-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250828230806.3582485-4-viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 12:07:07AM +0100, Al Viro wrote: > Clean fit for guards use; guards can't be weaker due to umount_tree() calls. > --- Did you drop my earlier RvB on accident? In any case: Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner