From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jack@suse.cz, djwong@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/2] iomap: prioritize iter.status error over ->iomap_end()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 11:07:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250902150755.289469-2-bfoster@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250902150755.289469-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
Jan Kara reports that commit bc264fea0f6f subtly changed error
handling behavior in iomap_iter() in the case where both iter.status
and ->iomap_end() return error codes. Previously, iter.status had
priority and would return to the caller regardless of the
->iomap_end() result. After the change, an ->iomap_end() error
returns immediately.
This had the unexpected side effect of enabling a DIO fallback to
buffered write on ext4 because ->iomap_end() could return -ENOTBLK
and overload an -EINVAL error from the core iomap direct I/O code.
This has been fixed independently in ext4, but nonetheless the
change in iomap was unintentional. Since other filesystems may use
this in similar ways, restore long standing behavior and always
return the value of iter.status if it happens to contain an error
code.
Fixes: bc264fea0f6f ("iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances")
Diagnosed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
---
fs/iomap/iter.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/iomap/iter.c b/fs/iomap/iter.c
index cef77ca0c20b..7cc4599b9c9b 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/iter.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/iter.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
iomap_length_trim(iter, iter->iter_start_pos,
olen),
advanced, iter->flags, &iter->iomap);
- if (ret < 0 && !advanced)
+ if (ret < 0 && !advanced && !iter->status)
return ret;
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-02 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 15:07 [PATCH RFC 0/2] iomap: ->iomap_end() error handling fixes Brian Foster
2025-09-02 15:07 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-09-03 6:09 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] iomap: prioritize iter.status error over ->iomap_end() Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-03 11:04 ` Jan Kara
2025-09-06 4:23 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-09-02 15:07 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] iomap: revert the iomap_iter pos on ->iomap_end() error Brian Foster
2025-09-02 21:11 ` Joanne Koong
2025-09-03 12:18 ` Brian Foster
2025-09-03 18:31 ` Joanne Koong
2025-09-03 13:38 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250902150755.289469-2-bfoster@redhat.com \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).