linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
	hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com, libaokun1@huawei.com,
	yukuai3@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] jbd2: ensure that all ongoing I/O complete before freeing blocks
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:33:36 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916093337.3161016-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916093337.3161016-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>

From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

When releasing file system metadata blocks in jbd2_journal_forget(), if
this buffer has not yet been checkpointed, it may have already been
written back, currently be in the process of being written back, or has
not yet written back. jbd2_journal_forget() calls
jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint() to check the buffer's status and
add it to the current transaction if it has not been written back. This
buffer can only be reallocated after the transaction is committed.

jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint() attempts to lock the buffer and
check its dirty status while holding the buffer lock. If the buffer has
already been written back, everything proceeds normally. However, there
are two issues. First, the function returns immediately if the buffer is
locked by the write-back process. It does not wait for the write-back to
complete. Consequently, until the current transaction is committed and
the block is reallocated, there is no guarantee that the I/O will
complete. This means that ongoing I/O could write stale metadata to the
newly allocated block, potentially corrupting data. Second, the function
unlocks the buffer as soon as it detects that the buffer is still dirty.
If a concurrent write-back occurs immediately after this unlocking and
before clear_buffer_dirty() is called in jbd2_journal_forget(), data
corruption can theoretically still occur.

Although these two issues are unlikely to occur in practice since the
undergoing metadata writeback I/O does not take this long to complete,
it's better to explicitly ensure that all ongoing I/O operations are
completed.

Fixes: 597599268e3b ("jbd2: discard dirty data when forgetting an un-journalled buffer")
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
 fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index c7867139af69..3e510564de6e 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -1659,6 +1659,7 @@ int jbd2_journal_forget(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 	int drop_reserve = 0;
 	int err = 0;
 	int was_modified = 0;
+	int wait_for_writeback = 0;
 
 	if (is_handle_aborted(handle))
 		return -EROFS;
@@ -1782,18 +1783,22 @@ int jbd2_journal_forget(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * The buffer is still not written to disk, we should
-		 * attach this buffer to current transaction so that the
-		 * buffer can be checkpointed only after the current
-		 * transaction commits.
+		 * The buffer has not yet been written to disk. We should
+		 * either clear the buffer or ensure that the ongoing I/O
+		 * is completed, and attach this buffer to current
+		 * transaction so that the buffer can be checkpointed only
+		 * after the current transaction commits.
 		 */
 		clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
+		wait_for_writeback = 1;
 		__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Forget);
 		spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 	}
 drop:
 	__brelse(bh);
 	spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock);
+	if (wait_for_writeback)
+		wait_on_buffer(bh);
 	jbd2_journal_put_journal_head(jh);
 	if (drop_reserve) {
 		/* no need to reserve log space for this block -bzzz */
-- 
2.46.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16  9:33 [PATCH 0/2] ext4: fix an data corruption issue in nojournal mode Zhang Yi
2025-09-16  9:33 ` Zhang Yi [this message]
2025-09-16 10:56   ` [PATCH 1/2] jbd2: ensure that all ongoing I/O complete before freeing blocks Jan Kara
2025-09-16  9:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] ext4: wait for ongoing I/O to " Zhang Yi
2025-09-16 10:57   ` Jan Kara
2025-10-02 11:42 ` [PATCH 0/2] ext4: fix an data corruption issue in nojournal mode Gao Xiang
2025-10-06 13:52   ` Jan Kara
2025-10-06 14:37     ` Gao Xiang
2025-10-09 14:58     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-10-15  2:44 ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250916093337.3161016-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    --to=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).